Semantic Analysis by spaCy
India Pistons Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Decided On : Jul-24-1973
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 2(h, Section 2(h, Section 2(h, Section 2(h, Section 2(h, Section 2(i, Section 2(h, Section 2(h
PERSON: Ramanujam, Greene, Baidya Nath
NORP: J.1, contra, Induce
CARDINAL: two, two, 3, 5, 4, 1921, 2, 222, 1, 2, 296, 15, 367, 26, 171, 200, 25,000, 184, 32, 649, two, 150
DATE: years, 1964-65, 1965-66, 1956, the year 1964-66, the year 1965-66, 1956, the end of the year, the assessment years, the current year, 1956, 1949, 1964, 1953, applicable.10, the end of the year, the year, the end of the year, the subsequent year, 1970, a year, the end of the year, sales.11, the subsequent year, 1969, 1929, 1973, the end of the year
ORG: the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Appellate, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Central Sales Tax Act, follows:'Sale, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Legislature, Brown v. National Provident Institution, M.R., us.8, Ambica Mills Ltd., State of Gujarat, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, Legislature, the Additional Judge (Revisions, Sales Tax, the Central Sales Tax Act, Legislature, the Central Sales Tax Act
MONEY: five per cent, five per cent, five per cent, five per cent, five per cent, 2 per cent, 10 per cent
TIME: 2 to Section 2(r
WORK_OF_ART: English Dictionary
GPE: Wellsted, T.C., Madras v. Jeewanlal