Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

India Pistons Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Decided On : Jul-24-1973

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 2(h, Section 2(h, Section 2(h, Section 2(h, Section 2(h, Section 2(i, Section 2(h, Section 2(h

PERSON: Ramanujam, Greene, Baidya Nath

NORP: J.1, contra, Induce

CARDINAL: two, two, 3, 5, 4, 1921, 2, 222, 1, 2, 296, 15, 367, 26, 171, 200, 25,000, 184, 32, 649, two, 150

DATE: years, 1964-65, 1965-66, 1956, the year 1964-66, the year 1965-66, 1956, the end of the year, the assessment years, the current year, 1956, 1949, 1964, 1953, applicable.10, the end of the year, the year, the end of the year, the subsequent year, 1970, a year, the end of the year, sales.11, the subsequent year, 1969, 1929, 1973, the end of the year

ORG: the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Appellate, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Central Sales Tax Act, follows:'Sale, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Legislature, Brown v. National Provident Institution, M.R., us.8, Ambica Mills Ltd., State of Gujarat, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, Legislature, the Additional Judge (Revisions, Sales Tax, the Central Sales Tax Act, Legislature, the Central Sales Tax Act

MONEY: five per cent, five per cent, five per cent, five per cent, five per cent, 2 per cent, 10 per cent

TIME: 2 to Section 2(r

WORK_OF_ART: English Dictionary

GPE: Wellsted, T.C., Madras v. Jeewanlal

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //