Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

English Electric Company of India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Oct-11-1979

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 18, Section 256(1, the I.T. Act, Section 13, Section 13(1, Section 13, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, Section 5, the I.T. Act, Section 13(1, Section 154/155, the I.T. Act, the Surtax Act

ORG: Sethuraman, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, AAC, Tribunal, the First Schedule, i., ITO, ITO, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, the general reserve, ITO, India Foils Ltd., ITO, ITO, The Calcutta High Court, ITO, ITO, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Mysore High Court, Mysore Electrical Industries Ltd., The High Court, Tribunal, The Bombay High Court, the general reserve, ITO, High Court, the general reserve, The High Court

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

DATE: 1964, '1, 1964, 1961, years 1964-65, 1965-66, 1966-67, each of these years, the assessment year 1964-65, 1st February, 1965, 27th September, 1968, 1st October, 1962, 1,59,087, the assessment year 1965-66, the 18th November, 1965, 1,11,65,563, the assessment year 1966-67, October 29, 1966, 1,25,25,322, the previous year, these years, all these years, the first day of the previous year, the assessment year, 1922, 1961, 1961, year 1962-63, the previous years, the assessment, year 1962-63, three subsequent years, 1961, this year, another year

CARDINAL: 1961.2, 2, 3, 64,94,868, 94,495, 1,26,25,580, 1,00,258, two, One, two hundred thousand, 8, One, 3, 1973]91ITR72(Cal, one, three, two, 1971]80ITR571(KAR, 1978]112ITR215(Bom, 4,86,298, 7,50,000, 10,54,410, 5,68,112, 5,68,112, 19

MONEY: ten per cent, hundred per cent

WORK_OF_ART: the Second Schedule

PERSON: Schedule, Surtax

ORDINAL: Second, first, first, second, first, second, second

GPE: assessee, question.14, I.T.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //