Semantic Analysis by spaCy
English Electric Company of India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Decided On : Oct-11-1979
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 18, Section 256(1, the I.T. Act, Section 13, Section 13(1, Section 13, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, Section 5, the I.T. Act, Section 13(1, Section 154/155, the I.T. Act, the Surtax Act
ORG: Sethuraman, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, AAC, Tribunal, the First Schedule, i., ITO, ITO, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, the general reserve, ITO, India Foils Ltd., ITO, ITO, The Calcutta High Court, ITO, ITO, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Mysore High Court, Mysore Electrical Industries Ltd., The High Court, Tribunal, The Bombay High Court, the general reserve, ITO, High Court, the general reserve, The High Court
NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian
DATE: 1964, '1, 1964, 1961, years 1964-65, 1965-66, 1966-67, each of these years, the assessment year 1964-65, 1st February, 1965, 27th September, 1968, 1st October, 1962, 1,59,087, the assessment year 1965-66, the 18th November, 1965, 1,11,65,563, the assessment year 1966-67, October 29, 1966, 1,25,25,322, the previous year, these years, all these years, the first day of the previous year, the assessment year, 1922, 1961, 1961, year 1962-63, the previous years, the assessment, year 1962-63, three subsequent years, 1961, this year, another year
CARDINAL: 1961.2, 2, 3, 64,94,868, 94,495, 1,26,25,580, 1,00,258, two, One, two hundred thousand, 8, One, 3, 1973]91ITR72(Cal, one, three, two, 1971]80ITR571(KAR, 1978]112ITR215(Bom, 4,86,298, 7,50,000, 10,54,410, 5,68,112, 5,68,112, 19
MONEY: ten per cent, hundred per cent
WORK_OF_ART: the Second Schedule
PERSON: Schedule, Surtax
ORDINAL: Second, first, first, second, first, second, second
GPE: assessee, question.14, I.T.