State of Madras Represented by the Deputy Commr. of Commercial Taxes, Kakinada Division, Kakinada and ors. Vs. Pothuri Srinivasulu Shreshty Son, Merchants and Commission Agents, Ongole Guntur Dist. and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-05-1954

Court: Chennai

LAW: Section 3, Section 3, Section 2(b, Section 3, Section 8 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, the Full Bench on Section 8 of the Act, Section 8, Section 8, the Pull Bench

PERSON: Satyanabayana Rao J.1, ho, Madras, Vivian Bose J., T. R. Cases Nos, T. R. Cases Nos

PRODUCT: department.2, the Full Bench, the Full Bench

WORK_OF_ART: Tax Case No. 4 of 1953, Title'

CARDINAL: one, 35,881-2-3, 4455-3, 3, two-fold, two, one, one, two, two, two-fold, 723, only one, one, 4, 103, 134, 195, 250, 345, 350, 352

ORG: P. Srinivasulu Chetty and Sons, Tribunal, Advocate General of, the Government Pleader, Court, AIR 1953, principal.6, Oxford, Tribunal

GPE: Salem, Clause, Salem

ORDINAL: second, first, second

DATE: 1939, each year, 19S of 1953, 1953