Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Southern Roadways (P.), Ltd. Vs. Madurai Veeraswami Nadar (Died) and ors.

Decided On : Oct-07-1963

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution granting, Article 133 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 226, Article 133 of the Constitution, Article 133, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 133, Article 133, Article 133, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 226, Article 133 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution for purposes of, the Fundamental Rights, Constitution, Article 226 :, Article 226, Constitution, the Rule of Law, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution.17, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 133 of the Constitution the, Article 133 of the Constitution, Section 109, Section 205, Article 133 of the Constitution, Section 205, Section 205, Article 133.Syedna, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 133, Article 226, Article 133 of the Constitution, Article 133, Article 133, Article 226, Article 133, Article 133, Article 226 of the Constitution

PERSON: S. Ramachandra Iyer, Ramachandra Iyer, Ganapatia Pillai, C. Dhanalakshmi, Balakrishna Ayyar, J., Bench, Ramachandra Iyer, Richard Couch, 8 Beng, L.R., Arnold White, Tuljaram v. Alagappa, Krishnaswami Ayyar, J., Vijay Anand, Asrumati Debi v., Kumar Rupendra Deb Rajkot, S.C.J. 300, J., Asrumati Debi v., Kumar Rupendra Deb Rajkot, George Lowndes, Abdul Rahman v., L.R., I.L.R., I.L.R., Madhavan Nair, Vijay Anand, Subba Rao, J., L.R., Nagappa, J., Orissa, Madan Gopal Rungta, L.R., Viscount Cave, Abdul Rahman v., I.L.R., Kuppuswami Rao, Mohammad Amin Brothers, Mukherjea, J., Kumar Rupendra Deb, Abdul Rahman v., I.L.R., G. Ramaswami, Ryots of Garabandha, Kapur Singh v. Union, Orissa, Madan Gopal Rungta, Rajamannar, Panchapakesa Ayyar, J.

CARDINAL: three, one, 117, 1957)2MLJ567, 3, one, two, one, two, 999, 95, 117, two, 147, 1957)2MLJ567, 39, 15, One, one, 1962]45ITR414(SC, 1, two, one, 11, two, 15, 1, 2, 2, 525, 1953]4SCR1159, 64, 307, 76, 60, 979, 1962]45ITR414(SC, 138 to 142, 1, 1, 1955]1SCR250, 1960]2SCR146, 1952]1SCR28, one, 47, 124, 39, 64, 307, 60, 139, 842, 1159.21, 1, 713, 64, 307, 60, one, 117, two, 1938)2MLJ154, 173, two, One, 1952]1SCR28, 1957)2MLJ567, 117, 147

WORK_OF_ART: I.T., Tuticorin and Koilpatti, I.T.

ORG: the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, challenged.2, the Regional Transport Authority, the StateTransport AppellateTribunal, W.P. No, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Srinivasan, Court, Advocate-General, Court, Tribunal, Court, the High Court, the Madras Letters Patent, Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, High Courts, the Supreme Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, Judges of, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, the Original Side of the High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Ramanarayana Podar & Co., I.L.R., Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Cassim & Sons, State, the Supreme Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, Court, Court, Tribunal, the Superior Court, Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, Rajamanner, C.J., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Appellate Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Q.B. 574, the Medical Appeal Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sattar Sahib, Mahaboob Sheriff & Sons v. Mysore S.T. Authority, the High Courts, Tribunal, Courts, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, State, the Statutory Authorities, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Tribunal, Letters, Firm of Ramachand Manjimal, Goverdhandas Vishindas Ratanchand, Cassim & Sons, P.C.).20, the Government of India Act, the Government of India Act, Court, Order, Dominion of India, the Government of India Act, Jethanand & Sons v. State of, Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court, Taker, Cassim & Sons, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Parlakimedi, Tribunal, Court, the Punjab High Court, the Supreme Court, the Additional Custodian of Evacuee Property, Court, the Supreme Court, State, Department, Court

LOC: Southern Roadways, Southern Roadways, the Southern Roadways, Madras

ORDINAL: first, first, first, Secondly, Secondly

DATE: 1957, 1960, 1961, 1872, 1953, 1953, 1953, 1159In, 1954, 1954, 1932, 58, 1929, 1957, 1952, 1957, June 13, 1956, 1920, 1932, 76, 58, 1935, 1935, 1950, 1949, 1950, 1935, 1963, 1962, 1932, 76, 58, 1960, 1961

GPE: WA, C. Danalakshmi v. Income, Mukherjea, Venkataratnam, India, Venkatasubba Rao, W.A., Denning, L.J., L.R., Basappa, England, Mukherjea, A.I.R., Asrumati, Bombay, P.C., Satyanarayana, Dhanalakshmi

EVENT: Clauses 15, Clause 15, Clause 15, Clause 15

PRODUCT: Calcutta, a Full Bench, Debt, a Full Bench

NORP: Central Brokers, R., R., English

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //