Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajasthan Investment Corporation Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Decided On : Jan-11-1967

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution for the, Section 45(2)(a, Section 45(2)(a, Section 46(1)(b, Section 46(1)(a, Section 16-A of the Madras General Sales Tax Act of, Section 48(2, Section 16-A, the Evidence Act, the Sales Tax Act, Section 16-A of the Sales Tax Act, the Local Boards Act, Section 164(1, Section 45(2, Section 48, the Sales Tax Act, Section 45(2)(a, the Sales Tax Act, Section 46, Section 33, Section 45(2)(a

ORG: ORDERRamakrishnan, the Rajasthan Investment Corporation, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, Thyagarayanagar, Investment Corporation, State, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959.The, the Court of the Sixth, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the General Sales Tax Act, Government Pleader, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, Magistrate, Court, Taluq Board, Local Board, Magistrate, Board, Magistrate, the Sales Tax Department, K.J. Lingam and

DATE: 11th May, 1964, the year 1958-59, the year 1958-59, May, 1959, 18th May, 1964, more than five years, the end of the year, 1959, 1958, 1959, 1939, the year, 1958, Section 48(2, 1959, 1920, 1966, five years, five years, more than five years, 1963, 1967

CARDINAL: 24,224, 1,453, 2,908, 1,000, 1,000, 9, 510, 9, 510, 527, 519, 2, 446, 6, 2, one thousand, 2,908, 1,000, 1,000, 19

ORDINAL: first

MONEY: 6 per cent

TIME: 10-30 a.m.

PERSON: Magistrate, V.M. Ramalingam, V.M. Ramalingam, Tade-palligudam, Ramachandra Chettiar, Pleader, Pleader

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench

LOC: Magistrates, Madras

GPE: Ramaswami, Venkatadri

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //