Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Messrs. Shaw Wallace and Co. Vs. Messrs. K.M. Subbier and Sons

Decided On : Nov-25-1920

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 9, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 9, the Indian Arbitration Act, the English Arbitration Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 13 of the Common Law Procedure Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 19, the English Arbitration Act, Section 9, Section 15, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 9(b, Section 9, Section 9(b, Section 9(b, Section 9, Section 19, the English Act, the Indian Act, Section 9, Section 9(b, Section 9(b

PERSON: John Wallis, Kumaraswami Sastri, J., Shaw Wallace, Ramesam, J.6, V.V. Srinivasa Iyengar, Thomas v. Fredricks

CARDINAL: two, 1, 2, 5, 12, two, 44, two, two, 6, one, 14, 555, one, two, 12, 6, 1, 181, two, two, two, 10, 775, 116, 1, 181, 52

DATE: 1899, seven., 1899, the 1st, the 30th April 1919, May the 7th, another month, June, seven days, the 27th June, the 1st July, July 9th, July 5th, the 8th July, the day, the 14th July, the day, 1854, seven clear days, seven days, seven days, 1872, 1854, 1898, July 1st, July 5th, 1899, seven days, 1899, seven days, 1847, 1898

ORG: the Madras Chamber of Commerce, the Chamber of Commerce, Vakil, Solicitors, the High Court, Court, Gumm v. Hallett, the High Court, the Court of Appeal, Court, Court, Court, the Court of Appeal, Court, Court, Court, Court, Q.B., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court

NORP: European, European, European, Hosken, European, European, Hosken

ORDINAL: 2nd, 9th, first, first, third, second, 9th

WORK_OF_ART: the Common Law Procedure Act

GPE: Lindley, M.R., do.7, Lindley, M.R., Chitty, L.J., Chitty, L.J.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //