Semantic Analysis by spaCy
T.V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Private Limited Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer and anr.
Decided On : Feb-17-1960
Court : Chennai
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution for the, Madras Act, Madras Act IX, the Turnover and Assessments, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 17 of the Act, the Amending Act, Section 17 of Act XV, Section 17, Section 17, Section 3 of Act XVII, Section 3, Rule 12, Rule 12, Rule 11, Rule 12, Section 11, Section 12, Rule 12, Rule 12, Rule 12, Rule 12, Rule 12, Rule 12
PERSON: Ramachandra Iyer, Krishnaswami, Krishnaswami, Rajagopala Ayyangar, Rules 14-A
NORP: J.1
ORDINAL: first, first
ORG: Madurai, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Court, Court, the High Court, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Taxes, Government, the High Court, the Madras Legislature, Sections 2 and 3(1, Tribunal or Court, Tribunal or Court, Taxes, Tribunal or Court, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Court, Court, Tribunal, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, Muthu Muna Muthukaruppan, Court, Legislature, Court, Tribunal, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Madras General Sales Tax, the General Sales Tax Rules, Government
DATE: years 1948-49, 1949-50, the assessment year 1948-49, the year 1949-50, 2nd March, 1953, 7th May, 1953, years 1948-49, 1949-50, January, 1954, 1954, 1954, 1954, 6th July, 1954, the 1st April, 1954, 1939, the 1st April, 1954, 1954, August, 1956, 1954, the 1st of April, 1954, 1954, 1954, years 1948-49, 1949-50.6, 1957, 1960, 1949, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1954, -14-A. Where, two months, 1954, 1954, 1954
CARDINAL: 4,927-2-6, 13,369-9-3, 4,927-2-6, 13,369-3-3, 2, one, three, 1, 5, 12, 4,957-2-6, 13,369-3-3, 2, 151, 503, 11, 220, 4 1/2, only three, 25,000, three, 3, 8, 12, 14, 15(2, 2, 12, 15(2
PRODUCT: 151
LOC: W.P. Nos
GPE: Tiruchi