Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

B. Seetharama Pillai Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and anr.

Decided On : Apr-12-1978

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 34, Section 9(2, Section 9(2, Section 9(2, Section 9(2, the I.T. Act, Section 4(1)(a)(i, the W.T. Act, Section 4(1)(a)(i, Section 4(1)(a)(i, Section 9(2, Section 9(2

PERSON: Ramanujam, Agrl, Agrl, Buddanna, N. V. Narendranath v. CWT, Narendra Lal v., N. V. Narendranath v. CWT, Joint, Buddanna

NORP: J.1, Commr, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

QUANTITY: 20.08 acres, 26.86 acres, 13.34 acres

DATE: the year 1971-72, the assessment year 1972-73, July 18, 1972, May 26, 1974, October 10, 1974, October 10, 1974, the year, June 27, 1970, June 27, 1952, the year, September 15, 1938,continues, the year 1938, 1938, 1957

ORG: Travancore-Cochin Agricultural Income-tax Act, ITO, ITO, I.T., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, HUF, HUF, the Supreme Court, HUF, the Supreme Court, HUF, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Allahabad High Court, HUF, WTO, HUF, HUF, Section, the Allahabad High Court, CIT

CARDINAL: 2, two, 3, 4., 1966]60ITR293(SC, 1969]74ITR190(SC, 1974]93ITR534(All, 5, at least two, 6, 1969]74ITR190(SC, 198, two, 1966]60ITR293(SC, two, one, 8, 9, 10

ORDINAL: second, first, second

GPE: Gowli

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, a Full Bench of

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //