Semantic Analysis by spaCy
B. Seetharama Pillai Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and anr.
Decided On : Apr-12-1978
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 34, Section 9(2, Section 9(2, Section 9(2, Section 9(2, the I.T. Act, Section 4(1)(a)(i, the W.T. Act, Section 4(1)(a)(i, Section 4(1)(a)(i, Section 9(2, Section 9(2
PERSON: Ramanujam, Agrl, Agrl, Buddanna, N. V. Narendranath v. CWT, Narendra Lal v., N. V. Narendranath v. CWT, Joint, Buddanna
NORP: J.1, Commr, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu
QUANTITY: 20.08 acres, 26.86 acres, 13.34 acres
DATE: the year 1971-72, the assessment year 1972-73, July 18, 1972, May 26, 1974, October 10, 1974, October 10, 1974, the year, June 27, 1970, June 27, 1952, the year, September 15, 1938,continues, the year 1938, 1938, 1957
ORG: Travancore-Cochin Agricultural Income-tax Act, ITO, ITO, I.T., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, HUF, HUF, the Supreme Court, HUF, the Supreme Court, HUF, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Allahabad High Court, HUF, WTO, HUF, HUF, Section, the Allahabad High Court, CIT
CARDINAL: 2, two, 3, 4., 1966]60ITR293(SC, 1969]74ITR190(SC, 1974]93ITR534(All, 5, at least two, 6, 1969]74ITR190(SC, 198, two, 1966]60ITR293(SC, two, one, 8, 9, 10
ORDINAL: second, first, second
GPE: Gowli
PRODUCT: a Full Bench, a Full Bench of