Semantic Analysis by spaCy
S. Naganathan Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Decided On : Feb-11-1975
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1)(a, Section 4(1)(a, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 5(l)(iv, Section 4(1)(a, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1)(a).2, Section 27(1, Section 4, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1, Section 4(1)(a, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 2(e, Section 3, Section 5, Section 4, Section 4(1, Section 4(1, Section 4(1)(a, Section 4, Section 5(1, Section 4(1, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 33, Section 4(3, Section 4(1)(a, Section 4(1, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1)(a
GPE: Ramaswami
DATE: the assessment years 1964-65, 1957.'Whether, years 1964-65, 1965-66, 1957, every assessment year
CARDINAL: 99,908, one, 17, 1,00,000, one, 64,000, transferee, 3, 3, 5(1)(iv, 33, transferee, 3, 5(1)(iv, 250
PERSON: Lakshmi Colony, T. Nagar, Madras, Bill, Bill
ORG: Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, Parliament, the Select Committee, the Select Committee, the Select Committee, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Act, Parliament, Parliament, Suffice, Parliament
MONEY: 2(m, 2(m
PRODUCT: Schedule