Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

S. Naganathan Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Decided On : Feb-11-1975

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1)(a, Section 4(1)(a, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 5(l)(iv, Section 4(1)(a, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1)(a).2, Section 27(1, Section 4, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1, Section 4(1)(a, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 2(e, Section 3, Section 5, Section 4, Section 4(1, Section 4(1, Section 4(1)(a, Section 4, Section 5(1, Section 4(1, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 33, Section 4(3, Section 4(1)(a, Section 4(1, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 5(1)(iv, Section 4(1)(a

GPE: Ramaswami

DATE: the assessment years 1964-65, 1957.'Whether, years 1964-65, 1965-66, 1957, every assessment year

CARDINAL: 99,908, one, 17, 1,00,000, one, 64,000, transferee, 3, 3, 5(1)(iv, 33, transferee, 3, 5(1)(iv, 250

PERSON: Lakshmi Colony, T. Nagar, Madras, Bill, Bill

ORG: Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, Parliament, the Select Committee, the Select Committee, the Select Committee, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Act, Parliament, Parliament, Suffice, Parliament

MONEY: 2(m, 2(m

PRODUCT: Schedule

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //