Semantic Analysis by spaCy
N. Bala Subramanian Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by Commissioner and Secretary to Government Revenue Department
Decided On : Jan-19-1989
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 15, Administrative Tribunals Act, Administrative Tribunals Act, Section 19 of the Act, Constitution, Article 323, Section 14 of the Act (SCC, Section 14, the Administrative Tribunals Act, Section 28 of the Act, Section 19(1, Section 19(1
NORP: ORDERSivasubramanian, J.1
CARDINAL: 30-6-1988, 15, 15-2-1989, One, 1, two, 2
ORG: Office, the State Administrative Tribunal, Counsel, the State Tribunal, Court, the State Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Governmental Authorities, the State Administrative Tribunal, Government Advocate, court.5, the High Court, Tribunal, Committee, Tribunal, the High Court, The Administrative Reforms Commission, Civil Service Tribunal, Parliament, Administrative Tribunals, Government of India, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, S.P. Sampath, Kumar v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, High Courts, the High Court, the Supreme Court, High Courts, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Administrative Tribunal, High Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the Tribunal, Section 15, the Central Administrative Tribunal, G.P. Mathur, CAT, State, the State Administrative Tribunal, High Court, Tamil Nadu Government, the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Administrative Tribunal, G.P. Mathur, CAT, Shri K.B. Srinivasa Raghavan, Court
DATE: 1985, 36 years, 1969, 1987)ILLJ128SC, 1988, 58, 1985, 1988, 58
PERSON: Shri K., Chandra Mouli, Srinivasan Raghavan, M.I. Bala Sundaram, Ashkaram Aggl, Ajit Singh v. State, Ashkaram Aggl, Bench, M.I. Balasundaram
WORK_OF_ART: 42nd Amendment
GPE: India, Rajasthan, A.I.R., Singh v. State, Rajasthan, U.P.S.C., U.D.I., A.I.R.
PRODUCT: Article
TIME: 15 of the Act