M.M. Exports Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Mar-31-1993

Court : Chennai

LAW: Chapter VII, Section 167 of the Sea Customs Act, Section 167 of the Sea Customs Act, Section 3, Section 167(8, Section 3 of the Act, the Full Bench, Constitution, Article 15(4, Constitution, Constitution, Section 21, the Contract Act, Section 72, Section 21, Section 21 of the Contract Act

ORG: ORDERSrinivasan, Import-Export Policy, CIF, the Advance Licence a Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate, Joint, Export & Import Policy AM 92-97, CIF, CIF, the Indian Overseas Bank, Sowcarpet, CIF, No.38640, Customs, Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Collector of Customs, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Joint, the Exports & Imports Policy, Imports (Control) Order, Export & Import Policy, the Export & Import Policy, CIF, FOB, CIF, Bearings, Learned Counsel, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Collector of Customs AIR 1962, the Government of India, Union of India, Tarachand Gupta & Bros., Customs, Collector, the Sea Customs Act, Lokesh Chemical Works, Collector of Customs (Preventive, the Bombay High Court, the Import (Control) Order, Sneh Sales Corporation, Collector of Customs, ITC, the Imports (Control) Order, the Supreme Court, East India Commercial Company Limited v., Collector of Customs (Supra, Order, the Supreme Court, Fedco Pvt. Ltd., The Supreme Court, Fedco Private Ltd., Learned Counsel, Government, Learned Counsel, High Courts, the Supreme Court, State, State, the Bombay High Court, Government, the Supreme Court, Court, KB 227, Howell, Falmouth Boat Constructing Co. Ltd., AC 837, the House of Lords, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Union of India, Government, Century Spinning &, Ulhasnagar Municipal Council, SC, Court, Court, Howell, Supp, Learned Counsel, the Punjab & Haryana High,, State of Punjab, Amrit BanaspaU Ltd., Government, Government, Government, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Supreme, Parliament, Government, State, State, State, Reliance, Jit Ram Shiv, Bench, M.P. Sugar Mills, U.P., Bench, Union of India, Godfrey Philips India Ltd., Court, Jeet Ram v. State, State, State, Government, Jeet Ram's, Bench, Jeet Ram's, Jeet Ram's, Bench, Court, Government, Court, Government, Government, Motilal Sugar Mills, the Patna High Court, AIR 1980, M.P. Sugar Mill's, Godfrey Philips, the Supreme Court, Court, Government, Court, Government, State, Sections, State, State, State, Courts, the Apex Court, Government, Court, Court, Apex Court, Mulla 'Contract Act', State, Court, Jacob v. Madurai University, 3.8.1992, No.38640, D.E.E.C. Book

NORP: J.1, W.M.P. No.8 of 1993, American, Indian, American

DATE: 1992-97, 29.7.1992, a period of, 12 months, 17.9.1992, 054512, 23.9.1992, 15.10.1992, 6.11.1992, 11.11.1992, 20.11.1992, 11.11.1992, 1992-97, 25.11.1992, 1955, 1992-97, 49, 10.2.1993, 1898, 1981, 18.12.1986, 1955, 31.7.1986, 49, 1951, 1951, 1971, 1948, 1949, 1950, Vasanth, 11.11.1992, two weeks, to-day, one week

ORDINAL: first, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, third, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth, fourth

PERSON: were;(1, Ball, Ball, Licence, Madras, VIIB, Madras, Madras, specify:(a, bush, cancelled.10, Ch, Le, M.S. Mehta, Nos, Counsel, Surisingji Dajiraj, Nowranglal Agarwala v. State, Custodian E.P. v., B.K. Agarwala, Robertson, Bench, Robertson, para 46).As, ofHaryana, Jit Ram's, Haryana, Bench, Bench, Jit Ram's, Bench, Radhakisan Vora v. Board of Trustees, Tribes, Backward Classes, para 12).24, Counsel, Counsel, Chandra Nani, J.L. Kapur, Counsel, Vide N. Ramanathan v. State, Counsel

CARDINAL: 2, 8,258/-, 3, 66,121/-, 4, 5, 6, 37,383.50, 8), 2., 3.8.1992, 49, 86, 11,54,601/-, only three, 3.2.1993.4, 1 to 3, 49, 9(1, 49, 207, 1, twelve, 3, 149, 48, 56, 42, 2, 49, 12,208, 1.2.1993, 12,208, 8), 8), 135).11, 1983(13)ELT1456(SC, 295, 295, 295, 295, 15).The, 295, 23)12, 235, 1995.13, 8), 8, 1960]2SCR408, 49, one, one, two, three, 1975]2SCR359, two, 278, two, two, three, 10).Under, 23)19, 2, 667, 1, 1, 538, 12).20, 1980]3SCR689, two, 1979]118ITR326(SC, 1980]3SCR689, three, 1986]158ITR574(SC, 1980]3SCR689, 1979]118ITR326(SC, two, two, two, 1979]118ITR326(SC, 14).The, 1979]118ITR326(SC, 1986]158ITR574(SC, two, 1990]3SCR825, 16(4, four, 1.2.1993, 1976]3SCR387, 1973)IILLJ409SC, two, 3.8.1992, 3.8.1992, 1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3

GPE: M.S., Romania, Romania, Nos.147,148, India, Bombay, New Delhi, Faredoon, Surisingji, Governmental, Governmental, Governmental, Motilal, Motilal, Motilal Sugar Mills, Motilal Sugar Mills, Sao v., India, Kumar, Counsel, D.R., Kerala, D.E.E.C.

PRODUCT: F, 30.6.1986, Bench, a Full Bench, Bench, Shiva Prasad

LOC: Madras, Policy, East India, Policy, the Scheduled Castes

WORK_OF_ART: the Import Policy, 2 All ER

MONEY: 110 per cent

LANGUAGE: English, English