Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Smt. S. Pannadevi Vs. Govt. of India

Decided On : Apr-06-1990

Court : Chennai

LAW: Rule 8, the Drugs Act, Tariff Item, Rule 8, Rule 8, Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, Section 3, Rule 8(1, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(1)(g

ORG: ORDER1, Central Government, the Government of India, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue, J., the Central Excise Rules, Senior Central Government Standing Counsel, Indian Organic Chemicals Limited v. Union of India, ELT, the Supreme Court, Court, the Union of India, Court, Governments, Union of India, Government

GPE: C.E., valorem, valorem, Delhi

CARDINAL: 25-3-1981, 19-6-1980, 5%.3, 19-6-1980, seventy-five, 25, 19-6-1980, 80/80, one, one, three, four, one, 7 1/2, 5, 1988(35)ELT290(Mad, 6, 521, 1997]1SCR396, 2, 436

DATE: 1944, 1981, the first day of April, any financial year, seven and a half, seven and a half, 1944, 1944, the 19th June, 1980, seven and a half, any financial year', the financial year, 1940, 5010, 5011, 6315 of 1981, 1982, 1944, a financial year, 1980, 1978

PERCENT: 12 1/2%

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, first, third

LOC: Paragraph 1

PERSON: Elamurugan, R. Subramanian, A. Rafeeq Ali, Elamurugan, Match House, Nainar Sundaram, Elamurugan, P. Narasimhan, Jaipur Mills, ELT

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //