Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. P. Dhanalakshmi and Others
Decided On : Nov-24-1994
Court : Chennai
LAW: section 168, section 26, section 168, section 8, the Hindu Succession Act, the Hindu Succession Act, section 168, the Indian Succession Act, section 168, section 168, section 168, section 168, section 168, section 168, the Succession Act, section 168, section 168, section 19A, section 19A, section 19A, section 19A, section 19A, section 168, section 26, section 168, section 26
ORG: Thanikkachalam, Department, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, P. Balammal, Meenakshi, K. Periaswamy, Periaswamy, Periaswamy, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals, Department, Department, Department, Department, Meenakshi, Department, Tribunal, the Calcutta High Court, F. Harvey Ltd., CWT, the Bombay High Court, CIT, the Bombay High Court, CWT, Department, Department
DATE: 1961, year 1975-76, August 28, 1975, 1980, 1980, 1980, the assessment year 1976-77, 1961, August 28, 1975, 1957
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, One, 1366/, four, one, 1365/, 34,302, 6,876, 27,426, four, one-sixth, one-sixth, 3., one-sixth, 4, 5., 6., one, four, 168, 1980]126ITR748(Cal, 8., 1977]107ITR326(Mad, 1981]127ITR850(Bom, 1983]139ITR22(Bom, 46, 1981]127ITR850(Bom, 9, 10, one-sixth, one, 11
GPE: R.A., R.A., R.A., Karur
PERSON: P. Dhanalakshmi, Ponnusamy, Balammal, Balammal, P. Balammal, Balammal, Usha D. Shah, Usha D. Shah's
FAC: Mahamaya Dassi