Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hajee Mohammad HussaIn Sait of Hajee Abdulla Hajee Abubucker and Co. Vs. the Commissioner and Council, Corporation of Madras

Decided On : Oct-31-1950

Court : Chennai

LAW: Rule 17, Rule 15, Rule 15, H. 14, Rule 15, Order 41, Order 41, Rule 22, veryuseful:'I agree &, Order 41, Rule 22, Order 41, Rule 15

PRODUCT: Rajamannar C.J. 1

CARDINAL: three, 4, three, three, three, three, 24, 1-3-1949, 9-3-1949, 15, 1, 662, 14, 22, 362, two, 18, 41, 362, 162, 362, 1, 105, two, one, 29, 1950.--The, 9

ORG: the Taxation Appeals Committee, theTaxation Appeals Committee, Committee, the Taxation Appeals Committee, the Appeals Committee, the Appeals Committee, the Taxation Appeals Committee, Local Administration, Corporation, the Appeals Committee, the Taxation Appeals Committee, Committee, the Lahore H. C., cross-objectiona, Legislature, Ahmed Ali & Co. v. Comr., Corporation of Madras, Corporation

PERSON: Gomr, Small Causes, Ct, Notfn, George Gazette, Koshalia V. Biazuddin, A. I. R. 1936, I. L. R., Din Mohammad J., Koshalia v. Riazuddin, A. I. R. 1936, C. P. C., Ct, Dasrulal, I. L. B., Pollock J., C. P. C., John

DATE: 7-3-1949, 10 days, ten days, 10 days, ten days', ten days, one month, one month, 1945, 1944, 76, 1936, one month, the day, the day, one month, 1937, 1950

FAC: the Fort St, the Lahore H. C.

GPE: P.C., Mst, Labhu, Eaizuddin, A.I.R., Narayan, A.I.R.

PERCENT: 162 I. C. 336

LOC: Mst, Mt. Koshalia v.

NORP: R. C.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //