Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Hajee Mohammad HussaIn Sait of Hajee Abdulla Hajee Abubucker and Co. Vs. the Commissioner and Council, Corporation of Madras
Decided On : Oct-31-1950
Court : Chennai
LAW: Rule 17, Rule 15, Rule 15, H. 14, Rule 15, Order 41, Order 41, Rule 22, veryuseful:'I agree &, Order 41, Rule 22, Order 41, Rule 15
PRODUCT: Rajamannar C.J. 1
CARDINAL: three, 4, three, three, three, three, 24, 1-3-1949, 9-3-1949, 15, 1, 662, 14, 22, 362, two, 18, 41, 362, 162, 362, 1, 105, two, one, 29, 1950.--The, 9
ORG: the Taxation Appeals Committee, theTaxation Appeals Committee, Committee, the Taxation Appeals Committee, the Appeals Committee, the Appeals Committee, the Taxation Appeals Committee, Local Administration, Corporation, the Appeals Committee, the Taxation Appeals Committee, Committee, the Lahore H. C., cross-objectiona, Legislature, Ahmed Ali & Co. v. Comr., Corporation of Madras, Corporation
PERSON: Gomr, Small Causes, Ct, Notfn, George Gazette, Koshalia V. Biazuddin, A. I. R. 1936, I. L. R., Din Mohammad J., Koshalia v. Riazuddin, A. I. R. 1936, C. P. C., Ct, Dasrulal, I. L. B., Pollock J., C. P. C., John
DATE: 7-3-1949, 10 days, ten days, 10 days, ten days', ten days, one month, one month, 1945, 1944, 76, 1936, one month, the day, the day, one month, 1937, 1950
FAC: the Fort St, the Lahore H. C.
GPE: P.C., Mst, Labhu, Eaizuddin, A.I.R., Narayan, A.I.R.
PERCENT: 162 I. C. 336
LOC: Mst, Mt. Koshalia v.
NORP: R. C.