Rajah of Vizianagaram Vs. Government Represented by the Govt. Pleader - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-10-1932

Court: Chennai

LAW: Section 193, Section 17, the Divisional Officers of the district, Section 98, Section 193, Section 17, Section 17, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 9,i.e., Section 9, Act 8 of 1859, Order 1, Rule 2, Section 17, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 2, Rule 2.4, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 30, Section 193 of the Act, Section 193, Section 193, Section 198, Section 17, Section 17, Section 198

PERSON: Anantakrishna Ayyar, Ramamurda Ayyar, Act.5, Ramamurda Ayyar, Kiskori Lal Roy v., Shatril Chunder, Mozumdar, Parmeswar Pattar

NORP: J.1, Ponnammal, Ponnammal

CARDINAL: seven, seven, two, two, two, 829, 2, two, 829, 1882, 593, two, 1, 2, 3, 833, 833, 833

ORG: Court, Court, Court, District Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Act.6, Court, Government, Court, Court, the District Court

DATE: the year next before the date, annual, 1915, 1915, some weeks, annual

GPE: Act.3, Parameswara Pattar, A.I.R., A.I.R., A.I.R., A.I.R.

WORK_OF_ART: 38 Mad, 38 Mad, ' Under Section 17

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, a Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench

FAC: Parmeswara Pattar, Parmeswara Pattar