L.M. Chitale and anr. Vs. the Commissioner of Labour - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Sep-13-1963

Court: Chennai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, the Madras Shops and Establishments Act, Section 51, Section 2, Section 51, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 51, Section 41, the Madras Shops and Establishments Act, Section 6, Article 19 of the Constitution, Article 19(6, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Section 2, Section 2(j, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(j, Section 2(j)..................'It, Section 2(j, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(j).'I, the Finance Act, the Finance Act

ORG: ORDERSrinivasan, Workmen's Compensation, Chartered Architects, Workmen's Compensation, the Madras Shops and Establishments Act, the Royal Institute of British Architects, the Indian Institute of Architects, the Royal Institute, the Indian institute of Architects, Act, Workmen's Compensation, Workmen's Compensation, the Madras Shops and Establishments Act, Additional, Additional, the State Government, State, Lordships, Legislature, Legislature, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Lordships, the Royal Institute of British Architects, Government, Chambers, Workmen's Compensation

NORP: J.1, Indian

DATE: 27th October 1960, the 26th April 1961, 1961, 1961, 1961, monthly, the 1st, May 1959, the 30th May 1959, the 1st of June 1959, About a month later, 1960)ILLJ251SC, 1919, monthly

PERSON: W. P. No, T. M. Lingam, Sri S. L. Chitale, W. P. No, W. P. No, Lingam, Lingam, Lingam, Lingam, Lingam, M. R. Meher Industrial Tribunal, Lingam

CARDINAL: 602, one, 16, two, 602, 668, one, 300, 2, three, 16, 1962)ILLJ241SC, four, two, one, 668, 196X

PRODUCT: Lingar

GPE: Bombay, N. U. C. Employees, customers.10

ORDINAL: secondary, second