Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Chidambaram Chettiar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras

Decided On : Aug-30-1956

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 16(2, Section 18, the Pudukottai Companies Act, the Indian Companies Act, Section 18, Section 16, Section 18, Section 49, Section 16, Section 20 of the Act, Section 66, Section 16, Section 2, Section 2, the Indian Companies Act, Section 16, Section 16, Section 16, the Finance Act, Section 49-B of the Act, Section 16(2, Section 18(5, Section 49, Section 3, Section 16(2, Section 18(3-A, Section 16, Section 16(2, Section 16, Section 49-B, Section 49-B, Section 16(2, Section 16(2, Section 18(5, Section 16(2, Section 49-B, Section 49, Section 16(2, Section 18(5, Section 16(2, Section 4, Section 2, Section 16(2, Section 16(2, Section 18, Section 18(3-A, Section 16(2, Section 16(2, Section 12

PERSON: Rajagopala Ayyangar, Pudukottai, C. J., Joshi, Rama Rao Sahib, Nos

NORP: J.1, British, Indian, Indian, British, British, British, Indian, Indian, Indian, British, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, British, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

CARDINAL: four, 5, 31-3-1946, 47,612, 3-A, 2, 5, 2, 2, 18, 5, 2, 2, 6, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 18(5, 16(2, 18(3, 18, 5, 49, 2, 2, 9, 18(5, two, 43, One, two, 1, 1, two, two, 1, 2, 5, 20 to 23, 250

ORG: the Chettinad Company Ltd., British India, The Chettinad Company, the Chettinad Company, the South Indian Corporation, Madras) Ltd., the Chettinad Company, the South India Corporation, Madras) Ltd., the South India Corporation, Madras) Ltd., the Chettinad Company, Dividend, the Chettinad Company, Appellate, the Chettinad Company, the Chettinad Company, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, the Chettinad Company, The Chettinad Company, the Chettinad Company, Chettinad Company, the Indian Government, the Chettinad Company, Tribunal, the Chettinad Company, the Chettinad Company, the South India Corporation, Tribunal, the Chettinad Company, Sections 16, the Chettinad Company, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Chettinad Company Ltd., Parliament, Royal Charter, Letters Patent, the Central Board of Revenue, the Chettinad Company, the Chettinad Company, the South Indian Corporation, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, computation.9, the Judgment of the Bombay High Court, Blundell Spence and Co. Ltd., the High Court, Tribunal, the Chettinad Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

GPE: Pudukottai, India, Pudukottai, India, India, India, Bombay City, India, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, India, India, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom

DATE: year 1946-47, the accounting year ended, 1913, 1946, 1913, 1946, the previous year, the financial year, the financial year, 1939, a little later, 1952]21ITR28(Bom, '10, the assessment year, adverted.14, 1956, year 1946-47, 1946, 1953

MONEY: 60 per cent, 60 per cent, 60 per cent, 60 per cent

PRODUCT: Rule 14

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //