S. Sundaram Ayyar Vs. the Municipal Council of Madura and the Secretary of State for India in Council

Decided On : Dec-13-1901

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 168 of Act IV of 1884, Section 158 of Act IV of, the General Highway Act, the General Highway Act, Madras Act X, Section 11, Section 13, Section 23, Section 24.8, Section 3, Clause 27, Section 24, the Amendment Act III of, Section 163, Section 3, Clause 28).9, Section 149 of the Public Health Act, Section 149, Section 149 of the Public Health Act, a Local Act, Section 13 ', Section 149 of the Public Health Act, Section 96, Section 96, the Hydney Corporation Act, Section 32, Section 10, Section 38, Section 39, Section 22, the Indian Councils Act, Section 40 of, Section 1 of the Government of India Act, Section 37, Section 149 of the Act, Article, Section 28, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 23, the Limitation Act, Section 28, Article, Article 142 or, Section 3, Clause 28, Sections 32

ORG: Bhashyam Ayyangar, the Municipal Council of Madura, the Local Government, Madura, The Lower Court, District Munsif, State, State, be.7, the House of Lords, Campbell, the Metropolis Local Management Act, Legislature, Thesiger, Roils v. Vestry, the Indian Legislature, Madura, the English Metropolis Local Management Act, the Municipal Commissioners, the Municipal Commissioners, the Municipal Council, the Municipal Council, the Municipal Council, the Metropolis Local Management, the Public Health Act, the Court of Appeal, Coverdale, Legislature, Brett, Legislature, Parliament, Rolls, A.C. 434, the House of Lords, the Court of Appeal L.R., Parliament, Coverdale, Lordship, Lordship, Legislature, Parliament, Coverdale v. Charlton, the Court of Appeal, the Metropolis Local Management Act, Electric Lighting Company, the Municipal Council of Sydney v. Young, A.C. 457, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, the Municipal Council, the Privy Council, Coverdale, Rolls, Wandsworth Board of Works, United Telephone Company L.R., S.W. Railway Company, the Municipal Council, N.W. Railway Company, Naihati, the Allahabad High Court, XV, the Indian Legislature, the Government of India Act, Crown, the Indian Legislature, State, the Indian Legislature, the Government of India, Appellate Court, Dawes, Crown, R.R. 723, the Public Health Act, Reynolds, District Council of Presteign, Q.B. 604 Octave Chavigny &c., Lacite De Montreal, Wallasey Local Board, Tottenham Urban District Council, the Court of Appeal, the Public Health Act, XV, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, the Municipal Council, State, Council, Government, Government, Legislature, Coverdale, Rolls, A.C. 434, the Municipal Commissioners, the Municipal Commissioners, Plaintiff

NORP: J.1, English, Indian, Indian, Indian, English, Indian

CARDINAL: three, 2, 839, 846, two, 854, 374, 5, 116, two, One, 126, three, 1894, 2, 437, 439, 440, 441, 442, 442, 1899, 474, 459, two, 13, 15, 171, 732, 362, 154, 106, 67, 106, 22, 41, 8, 10, 378, 10, 24, 1896, 1, 149, 36, 593, 2, 146, 146, 144, 30, 1898, 1, 142, 1900, 1, 83.22, 792, 582, 795

DATE: 1897, the last thirty years, 1892, 1892, 1835, C. 50, 1855, 1850, 1865, 1855, 1865, 1865, 1871, 1884, 1897, 1897, 1897, 1897, 1855, 1875, 1875, '10, 1211, the present day, '11, '12, 1896, 1H75, '13, 1875, 1898, 1879, '15, 1884, 78516, 1895, 1876, 1864, 1865, 1858, 21, 1861, 24 and 25, 1859, 1875, 1879, 1896, 1875, 30 years, 1877, 30 years, 12 years, 30 years, 60 years', 30 years, 30 years, 12 years, 12 years, 1897, 1101, three months, 1896

PERSON: Municipality, Hatherley, Blackburn, Galbraith, Armour 4 App, Charlton L.R., Bramwell, James, Tunbridge Wells, Baird, Charlton L.R., Bramwell, Lordships, Herschell, Macnaghten, Morris, Charlton L.R., Glasgow, Glasgow, Birkenhead v. L., Kishori Lal Goswami, Calc, Bengal Act V of, Pramoda Nath, Calc, Azmat Ali Khan, Ch, Ch, Ch, Ch, Byles, Byles, Gibbs, Byles, Gracey, Williamson, Harrison, Hickman, Maisey, Benson, J25, Charlton 4, Tunbridge Wells, Baird

ORDINAL: third, second, first, first, first, first, third, second, first

GPE: Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Orr Ewing v., Scotland, England, L.J., Municipality, L.J., L.J., Cotton, L.J., L.J., Judges, James, L.J., Battersea Vestry v. County of London, A.C., Madhu, Sudhun, Nihal Chand, the City of Madras, India, Council, England, India, England, England, India, England, London, North-Western Railway Company, the City of Westminster 67, India, England, India, James, L.J.

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English, English, English

PRODUCT: Act III of, Lordship, the Common Law, Crown, the Common Law

QUANTITY: about 2 feet