Union of India Owning Southern Railway Rep. by Its General Manager, Chennai-3 Vs. Krishnammal and 3 Others

Decided On : Jul-16-2001

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Railways Act, the Railways Act, The Railways Act, the Railways Act, Article 21, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution (See, Section 123(c)(2, the Railways Act, Section 123(c(2, Section 124A of the Act

PERSON: Narayana Kurup, Samishankar, Krishammal, Saravanan, Dadar, Madras, Renigunta Railway Station, Samishankar, Lon L. Fuller, Chandra Bhan Dubey, P. A. Naryanan v. Union

NORP: J.1, Panchavarnam

CARDINAL: One, 6, 22.9.1990

DATE: 22.9.1990, 1995, 1989, the year 1990, the year 1995, the year 2001, 1989, 1.8.1994.7, 11 years

ORG: Dadar Express, O.A.No.93, the Railway Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Sections 123 and 124A, Tribunal, the Civil Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, L.P.A, Railway, the Civil Court, Court, the Claims Tribunal, Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Right to Life, U.P. State Co-operative, Land Developments Bank Ltd., Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, The Phraseology of Section 123(c)(2, the Claims Tribunal, p.a, L.P.A, C.M.P.

GPE: L.P.A., C.M.A., p.a.

PERCENT: 12%, 12%

ORDINAL: Second

LOC: Single