Selvaraj, S/O Gnanadesihan Vs. P. Viswanathan

Decided On : Jul-22-1999

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 29(2, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 138, Section 142, Section 138, Section 29(2, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Full Bench, the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, Act 66 of 1988, Section 138, Section 138.'The, Section 138, Section 138, Section 29 of the Code, Section 29, the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 29(2, Section 29 of the Code, Section 142 of the Act, the Indian Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code, Section 138, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 138, Section 142 of the Act, Section 142 of the Act, Section 142, Section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 138, Section 190(1)(a, Section 468(1)(b, Section 142 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 190 of the Code, Section 190 of the Code, Section 142, Section 29 of the Code, Section 142, Section 142(a)(b, Section 138 ofthe Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, the Bar Councils Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, the Bar Councils Act and Rule 38, Chapter v of, Section 15, Section 2, Bar Councils Act, section 9, Bar Councils Act, Section 2, the Bar Councils Act, section 2, Bar Councils Act, Section 37, Section 167 of the Code, Section 167 of the Code, Section 167 of the Code, the N.D.P.S. Act, Section 27, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 167 of the Code, the N.D.P.S. Act, Section 167 of the Code, Section 167 of the Code, Section 29, Section 37, Section 37, Section 36-A of the Same Act, Section 36-A, Section 167, Section 36-A, the N.D.P.S. Act, Section 36, Section 167, Section 167 of the Code, Section 36-C of the N.D.P.S. Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, the N.D.P.S. Act, Section 51, the Criminal Procedure Code, the N.D.P.S. Act, Section 37, Section 167, Section 37, Section 167, Section 167, Section 36, the N.D.P.S. Act, the TADA Act, Section 37, Section 167, Section 20, Section 167, the N.D.P.S Act, Section 20, Section 37, the TADA Act, Section 37, Section 20 of the TADA Act, Section 20 of the TADA Act, Section 167, the N.D.P.S. Act, Section 142(c, Section 36-a, Section 142 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 23, the Criminal Justice Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 29 of the Code, Section 29 of the Code, Section 138, Section 142 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 29, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138', Section 138, Section 138, Section 142 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 142, Section 29, Section 142 of the Act, Section 138, Section 11(1, Article 136 of the constitution, Section 138, Section 138, Section 142(c, Section 29 of the Code, Section 142 of the Act, Section 142 of the Act, Section 5-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 5-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 200 of the Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 5-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 4 of the Code, Section 138 of the Act, Section 29 of the Code, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 29 of the Code, Chapter, Section 36, Section 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 16, Section 16, Section 21, Section 61, Section 56, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Chapter XVII, Act 66 of 1988, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Chapter, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 138, Section 32(2, Chapter, Chapter IV-A, Section 36, Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 7(1)(a, Section 29 of the Code, Section 16, Section 138, Section 61, Section 29 of the Code, Section 13, Section 138, Section 138 of the Act, the Special Act, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 29 of the Code, Section 29 of the Code, Section 142, Section 29, Section 29(2, Section 142, Section 4(2, the Indian Penal Code, Section 138, Section 138, Section 29 of the Code, Section 325, Section 325, Section 138, Chapter to the Negotiable instruments Act, Section 138, Section 29 of the Code, Section 138

ORG: ORDERJudgement, Court, the Metropolitan Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate of First, Court, the Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Court, Court, the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate of the First Class or, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Court, High Courts, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Supreme Court, A.R. Antualy, Court, the Supreme Court, Section 325(1, State, the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, the Banking Public Financial Institution, Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amended, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Magistrates, The Court, The Court of a Magistrate of the, The Court of a Magistrate of the, The Court, the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate, a Metropolitan Magistrate, the Court of a Magistrate of the first, Metropolitan Magistrate, Rs.5000, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, the Metropolitan Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate of First, Section, Court, Counsel, Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate of the Second Class, Counsel, Act, the Metropolitan Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Magistrate, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Calcutta High Court, the Indian Bar Councils Act, a High Court, High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Practice, the Calcutta High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, the Apex Court, Supreme Court Advocate, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Bombay High Court, High Courts, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Bombay High Courts, the Apex Court, Apex Court, the High Court, Apex Court, the High Court, Apex Court, Apex Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Courts, Advocate, the Calcutta High Court, the Apex Court, the Original Side Rules, the Calcutta Bar Council, High Courts, Appellate Sides, Court, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, High Courts, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Original Side Rules, Bombay High Courts, the Supreme Court, Broome's Legal Maxims, Advocate of the Supreme court, the High Courts, Calcutta, Court, Court, Original, Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, Bombay High Courts, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, South India Corporation, Board of Revenue, Union of India, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Thamisharasi, the Supreme Court, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Supreme Court, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, Court, the Supreme Court, Thamisharasi, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, Section 167, the Special Court, Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, Supreme Court, Special Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the applicability of Section 167, The Supreme Court, Disruptive Activities, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Thamisharasi, the Apex Court, Section, the Apex Court, Court, Magistrate, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate of First Class, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Counsel, Privy Council, Judicial Dictionary, Court, Court, Counsel, Court, the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate of the First, Court, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, the Magistrate of the First, Magistrate, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Counsel, V.C. Shukla's, the Apex Court, the Special Court Act, P.N. Shinghal, the Supreme Court, theSpecial Court, Court, The Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi v. Employees, the Bharat Bank Ltd., a Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, A.R. Anthulay, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Metropolitan Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, A.R. Antulay's, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, House, Apex Court, House, Houses, House, Legislature, State, S.R. Das, State, Parliament, the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, the Metropolitan Magistrate, A.R. Antulay's, Magistrate, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Magistrates, Counsel, Magistrates, the Magistrate of the First Class, Counsel, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Court, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Counsel, Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Counsel, Court, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Court, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Counsel, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, the Metropolitan Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate, Court, The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, Sections 13, Chapter IV, Sections 3,, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, Mag, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Judicial Magistrate, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Union Parliament, Sections 138, the Union Parliament, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial First Class Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, Kerala High Court, Court, Kerala High Court Judgments, a Chief Judicial -Magistrate, the Magistrate of the First Class, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrates Courts, Judicial Magistrate, Parliament, Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Chief Judicial Magistrates' Courts, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate

PERSON: V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1, K.P. Sivasubramanian, Magistrate, Selvaraj, R.C. No.247, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli, Prabhakar v., Kumar N. Shan, Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak, K.P. Sivasubramaniam, Judicial Magistrate, Packiaraj, Raghavachari, Sections 138, Packiaraj, Magistrate-, Raghavachari, Actwhich, Arabinda Base, A.V. Fernandez v. State, Chandravarkar Sita Rama Rao v., Ashalata S. Guram, V.C. Shukla v. State, G.M. Kokil, R.S. Raghunath v. State, M. Venugopal v., L.I.C. Machilipatnam, Ashwini Kumar's, Packiaraj, Packiaraj, Ashwini Kumar's, Raghavachari, Basil Ranger Lawrence v. Emperor, Stroud, Rex, Punishable, J., Fazal Ali, J., Articles 132, Magistrate, Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak, Packiaraj, Bill, Bill, Bill, Bill, Gopal Base, J., Bill, deemed, Chapter XVII, Order, Packiaraj, Actbefore, T. Unnikrishnan v., Namala Kidav, Judicial Magistrate, Prabhakar v., Kumar N. Shah, C.C. 191, Crl, Mani Thiagangdn, M. Mohan, B. Mohan Krishna v. Union, Sections 138, A.Y.Prabhakar, K.P. Sahadevan v., T.K Sreedharan, Baby v. Vijayan, K.T. Thomas, J., K.T. Thomas, J.

DATE: 1973, 1997, 1881, 1995, a period of two months, 1996, 10.2.1997, one year, the beginning of Section 142, 1881, 1988, one year, 1973, one month, one year, seven years, three years, one year, One month, one year, one year, one month, 1951, 1926, 27, 1986]3SCR866, 1988, 1973, five years, 1987, 1989, '15, 58, 1951, 1948, three days, three days, 1994, today, 77, 1947, 1984, 1984, 1984, 1940, 1940, 1973, 1961, 1973, 1973, three years, one year, one year, 1940, 1961, 1954, 1973, 27, 28, 29, 1940, 1961, 4, 1973, 1993, 29.1.1998, 1995, 1856, 54, three years, 1995, C.C. 191, 1994, 36

CARDINAL: 1881.'2, 31.5.1996, 5000, more than 5000, 83, 191, four, 3., 138, 142, 142, 2, 5., 29, 1, 2, five thousand, 3, one thousand, 4, 2, 4, 6, 142, three, 8, 9, 1, 10, 12, 1953]4SCR1, 13, 24, 25, 8(1, 4(2, 10, 347, 9(4, 14(3, 4, 9(4, 14(3, two, 27, 1957]1SCR837, 1964]4SCR280, 1980CriLJ690, 1984)IILLJ20SC, 1953]4SCR1, 13(b, 1953]4SCR1, 1996(54)ECC7, 2, 2, 13, 1, 2, 8, 2, 2, 2, 2, 10, 1, 2, 2, 14, 8), 9, 1, 2, 4, 4, 4, 8), 9, 2, 36, 1953]4SCR1, 1953]4SCR1, 16, 1953]4SCR1, 17, 2827, 1, 2, 11, 6, 23, 1, 1, quarter, quarter, only one, 1953]4SCR1, 19, 1953]4SCR1, 372, 379, 1950)NULLLLJ921SC, 133, 134, more than Rs.25,000, 21, 195, 199, 277, 22, 1953]4SCR1, 23, 1954]1SCR587, 1964]1SCR371, 277, 16, 24, 25, five thousand, 26, 27, 27, 28, 28, 30, 32, 32 and 36, 32, 1954,Section 20(2, 18, 28, 29, 512, 5,000, 30, 32, 83, 12.6.1991, 33, 142, 5,000, 5,000, 34, two, 83, two, 1, 2, 81, 2,500, half, 35, more than five thousand

GPE: Crl, C.C.No.593, A.Y., Kerala, J.M.F.C., Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Section29, Aswini, India, India, Bombay, Kerala, Karnataka, Aswini, Counsel, N.D.P.S., Counsel, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., N.D.P.S., P.C., P.C., Aswini, Aswini, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Aswini, Delhi, Aswini, West Bengal v. Union of India, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Aswini, A.Y.

PRODUCT: No.1, Bench, Section 138 and Section 142, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138

LOC: Magistrates, Single, Magistrates

WORK_OF_ART: 'the Act, 'the Code').4, Fourth Edition, theMagistrate of the First Class or the Metropolitan Magistrate, Drugs and Cosmetics Act

ORDINAL: first, first, second, First, firstly, first, first, Firstly, first, second, first, firstly, firstly, first, Thirdly, first, first, First, First, first, First, First, Firstly, Firstly, First, first, first, first, first, First, First, firstly, Secondly, First, First, second, first, first

NORP: Magistrates, Terrorist, Chapters

FAC: the Bombay High Court, Sections 56, Sections 138

EVENT: the N.D.P.S. Act, the N.D.P.S. Act

TIME: the present Act, 36 of that Act

LANGUAGE: Chapters