S. Venkatesh Kotadia Vs. Shantha Bai and ors.

Decided On : Jun-30-1960

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 65, Order 21, Rule 2, Article 166 Sch, the Limitation Act, Rule 92, Rule 89, Rule 92, Rule 89, Rule 89.The, Section 316, Rule 92, Rule 90, Section 65 and Rule 94, Section 65, Rule 92, Section 316, Rule 94, Rule 94, Rule 92, Rule 92, Section 151, Section 151

PERSON: Veeraswami, Order XXI, C. P. C., Rs, Dave Bhavani Sankar, Deva Jetharama Jebhai, Dave Ganpatram Jetharam, Dave Jayadevlal Jetharam, E. P. No, Madras, Madras, Davey Govindararn, P. T. Madras, Umrao Singh, Sorimuthu Pitlai v. Muthukrishna, Thangavelu Chettiar, C. P. C., Order XXI, George Lowndes, Madhavan Nair, Order XXI, Wadsworth, Order XXI, Madhavan Nair, J., Wadsworth, J.5, C. P. C., Wadsworth

NORP: J.1

ORG: Court, Nadiad, Santha Bai, the City Civil Court, Venkatesh Kotadia, Court, AIR1941Mad399, Court, the Privy Council, Judicial, Lordships, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, AIR 1933 Mad 598.In, the Privy Council, Nagpur High Courts, Court

CARDINAL: 31-3-1954, 17, 39,878, three, 133, 8, 15,000, one, 20,000, one-third, 88, 7,000, 4, 17, 31-10-1956, 5326-4, 20,000, 90, 91, 598, 1, 2, 89, 91, one, 92, 3, 4

DATE: 1955, 19th March, 1941, 89, Rule 89, 30 days, 1908, 1882, 1882, 1956

GPE: Ragunayakulu Street, I.L.R., India

ORDINAL: 2nd, second, first, third, third, third

FAC: Mint Street

MONEY: 5 per cent

PRODUCT: Calcutta

TIME: AIR1941Mad399 .7