The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Chief Secretary and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice and anr.

Decided On : Feb-04-2004

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 60 of Prevention of Terrorism (Amendment) Act, Central Act 4 of, a Constitution Bench, Section 22, the Screening Committees or Review Committees, Section 60, Section 21, Section 60 of POTA-2002, the Principal Act, Section 19, Section 18, Section 40, Section 19, Section 60 of POTA-2002, Section 50 of the Act, Section 50 of the Act, Section 60, Section 60, Constitution, Article 131 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, Constitution, Section 60, Section 195 of Code of Criminal Procedure.(c, Article 131 of the Constitution of India, Section 321 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 131 of the Constitution of India, Article 131 of Constitution of India 12.(a, Article 131 of Constitution of India, Article 226 of Constitution of India, a Full Bench of Punjab & Haryana High Court, the Central Act, Article 226 of Constitution of India.(b, Article 131 of Indian Constitution, Article 131 of Constitution of India, Article 131 of Constitution, Article 226 of Constitution, Constitution, Section 226-A, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 131-A., Constitution, Section 60, Sections 19 and 46 of the Act, Section 60, Section 60, Section 60, the List II, Section 18, Section 19, Section 19, Section 33, Section 46, Constitution, Section 321, Section 60, Section 321 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 321 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 195 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Constitution, Section 321 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 60, Section 195 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 195 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 195, Section 60, Section 321 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 321 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 321 of Code of Criminal Procedure

PERSON: Subhashan Reddy, Ordinance, Bill, Kartar Singh v. State of, Law, Law, POTA-2002, read:'(1, Review Committees, Chairperson, POTA-2002, Haryana, POTA-2002, R.R. Gopal, M. Ganesan, K. Azhagu Sundaram, Veera Ilavarasan, M. Bhoominathan, S. Sivanthiyappan, A. Ganesh Murthy, R.M. Tiwari v. State, R.M. Tiwari's, W.P. Nos, C.S. Vaidyanathan, V.T. Gopalan, R. Shanmugasundaram, R.R. Gopal, Nakkiran Gopal, K. Chandru, Vaiko, C.S. Vaidyanathan, facie, V.T. Gopalan, K. Chandru, R. Shanmugasundaram, V.T. Gopalan, R. Shanmugasundaram, Jashbhai Patel, C.S. Vaidyanathan, V.T. Gopalan, Jashbhai Patel v. Union, C.S. Vaidyanathan, Jashbhai Patel v. Union, Review Committees, Mathew M. Thomas v. Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh, Kartar Singh's, M.D. Narayanan, V.T. Gopalan, V.T. Gopalan, V.T. Gopalan, K. Chandru, W.P.M.P. Nos, I. Subramanian

ORG: Sub-Sections, the Prevention of Terrorism (Amendment) Ordinance, POTA, POTA, Disruptive Activities, TADA, the Central Government, TADA, TADA, the Supreme Court, TADA, the Supreme Court, Committee, Review Committee, the Central Government, Home, Departments, TADA, the Central Government, TADA, Screening or Review Committee, State, Home, TADA, Committee, TADA, Supreme Court, the Central Government, the State Government, Shaheen Welfare Association v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, TADA, Committee, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, The Central Government, each State Government, Committee, Committee, a High Court, the Central Government, the State Government, the High Court, State, High Court, the Supreme Court, People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India, the Designated Court, the Central Government, Review Committee, Review Committee, IAS Officer, IPS Officer, Secretaries to Government of India, Review Committee, the Review Committee, the Central Government, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, POTA, Review Committee, the Review Committee, the Central Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Review Committee, the State Government, the State Government, a Review Committee, the Central Government, Review Committee, the State Government, the Review Committee, Central Government, the Review Committee, the State of Tamil Nadu, POTA, M/s. Vaiko, Nakkiran, P.S. Maniyan, POTA, the State Government, the State Government, POTA, the Investigating Officer/Pairavi Officer, the Investigating Agency, FIR, POTA, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, the Designated Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Review Committee, State, FIR, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, State Government, the Review Committee, Court, Additional Solicitor General, the Review Committee, Additional Solicitor General, the Review Committee, the Appropriate Authority, Review, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, the Designated Court, Review Committee, the State Government, Court, the Designated Court, The Review Committee, POTA, POTA, State, The Review Committee, the Central Government, the Review Committee and Review Committee, the Executive Government, Committee, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the State Government, State, the Review Committee, POTA, Court, the State of Tamil Nadu, Committee, the Review Committee, the Government of Tamil Nadu, Additional Solicitor General, Central Government, W.P. Nos, W.P. No, W.P. No, State, the Review Committee, State, Additional Solicitor General, the Union of India, the Supreme Court, Review Committees, Additional Solicitor General, POTA, Parliament, Parliament, Additional Solicitor General, W.P. No, W.P. Nos, the Review Committee, POTA, the Review Committee, State, POTA, TADA, Supreme Court, the Review Committees, the Review Committee, POTA, the Supreme Court, Peoples' Union of Civil Liberties, Review Committee, State, the Review Committee, the State Government, POTA, the Central Government, the Review Committee, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, State, Punjab v. Union of India, AIR 1971, P & H, the Gujarat High Court, State, the State Government, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, State of Bihar v. Union of India, Union of India, Court, the State Government, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, the Government of India, the Government of India, State, Supreme Court, Original Side, Centre-State, State of Punjab v. Union of India, the Central Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Supreme Court, State, Commission, the Central Government, Ministers of Karnataka Government, the Commission of Enquiries Act, the Central Government, Review Committee, the Special Court, the Leader of Opposition, the Central Government, the State of Gujarat, State, a Public Interest Litigation, the Supreme Court, State of Bihar v. Union of India, Central Review Committee, the Central Review Committee, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, Union of India, the High Courts, Central Laws, the Supreme Court, High Courts, State Laws, Central Laws, Court, the Review Committee, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, POTA 2002, Parliament, Review Committee, the Supreme Court, the Review Committee, the Supreme Court, Income Tax, High Courts, The High Courts, Madras, Punjab & Haryana, the Supreme Court, High Courts, State, Parliament, the State Legislatures, State, Parliament, Parliament, the Supreme Court, Peoples' Union of Civil Liberties, POTA, Parliament, the Central Government, the Review Committee, State, The State Government, Court, Court, POTA, the State Government, Central Government, the Review Committee, the State Government, the State Government, POTA, the High Court, the Review Committee, POTA, the Review Committee, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Bakhtwar Trust, Court, Acquittal, Court, the Public Prosecutor, the State Government, the Public Prosecutor, the State Government, the Public Prosecutor, POTA, the State Government, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, POTA, the State Government, the Public Prosecutor, Review Committee, the Review Committee, the Public Prosecutor, Special Court, the Public Prosecutor, POTA, POTA, the Review Committee's, Review Committee, Review Committee, State Government, the State Government, the Review Committee, POTA, POTA, The Review Committee, the State Government, the Review Committee, State Government, The Review Committee, the State Government, Review Committee, The State Government, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, the Court of first instance, Court, POTA, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, POTA, POTA, the State Government, the Public Prosecutor, the State Government, the Public Prosecutor, the Special Court, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, Public Prosecutor, the Review Committee, Court, the Review Committee, the petitioner/ Government, the Review Committee

DATE: 5, 2003, 2003, 27.10.2003, POTA - 2004, the year 2002, 1987, 1984, quarterly, 2002, 40, 46, 40, 27.10.2003, 5, 14.11.2003, December, 35749, 35750, 2003, 23.1.2004, February, 2004, 1239, 1240 of 2004, 23.1.2004, 1238, 2004, 1239, 2004, 1238, 1240 of 2004, 1952, 2004, 1976, 1977, 2002, 2002, 23.1.2004, the end of June 2004, 1297 to 1299 of 2004, at least six weeks

CARDINAL: 6, 7, 2.1.2004, 265, 1996CriLJ 866, one, 2, three, 3, 389, 4.4.2003, two, one, 46, 4, 6, 1, 5, 4, 6, 4, 1, four, 1996CriLJ2872, 46, 2004.10, 4, 3, 1978]2SCR1, 155, 1., 1970]2SCR522, 1985]1SCR700, one, between two or more, three, 4, 6, 2.1.2004, 2.1.2004, 4, 6, 4, 6, 1999]236ITR691(SC, one, Eight, 2, one, 2, 2, 46

TIME: 27.10.2003 i.e.

ORDINAL: first, first, first, 4th, 5th, 6th, second, first, third, seventh, third, third, third, second, second

EVENT: Ordinance, List II

NORP: Terrorists, K. Nagarajan, inter-State

GPE: States, States, States, Ordinance, Delhi, New Delhi, Karnataka v. Union of India, Babubhai, Rajasthan, States, States, States, Babubhai, Karnataka v. Union of India, Babubhai, Delhi, Centre, Centre, States, POTA, sustainable15

PRODUCT: Schedule, Bench, Articles 131-A, Schedule, Schedule, Only Section 321 of Code of Criminal Procedure

LANGUAGE: English

QUANTITY: only Section 321 of Code of