Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Subbarau Nayudu Vs. Yagana Pantulu and anr.

Decided On : Dec-03-1895

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 18(a)1 of Act XV, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 302, Section nineteen

CARDINAL: 1, 236, 1, 10, 604, 12, 625, 299, one, 6, 184.3, one, two thousand, 2, One, one, one

DATE: 1895, the 26th April, 1882, the 25th of March 1892, the 26th April, 18 Mad, many years, 1885, the 25th of March 1892, April 1895

ORG: Court, Court, Court, Registrar, Court, the High Court, Registrar, the High Court, Court, Registrar, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Small Cause Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Small Cause Court, the Small Cause Court, Court, Court, Court, Court

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first

GPE: the Kistna District, Bissessuree

PERSON: Ramakristna Sastrulu, Darba Lakshmidevamma, Krishnaji Lakshman, Vithal Ravji, Tirtha Sami v., Seshagiri Pai, Jackson, J., Chunder Madhub Chuckerbutty v., albeit jurisdiction

LOC: Suits

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //