Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Tamil Nadu-i Vs. Satish

Decided On : Sep-09-1981

Court : Chennai

LAW: the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, Section 2(m)(ii, the General Clauses Act, Central Act No, section 2(m)(ii

PERSON: Balasubrahmanyan, Debts, M. N. Rajam, vide s. 13(2, Macnaghten, Samuel v. Jarrah Timber, Archbishop Mathais Avenue

CARDINAL: two, one, 2, two, one, two, 3., 5(1)(iv, one, 4., one, 6, 538, 1982]133ITR75(Mad, only half, one-half, half, one, 8, one, 9, one, two, three, one, 10, two, 11, 12, two, one, one, 182, two, two, 13, one, 2(m)(ii, one, two, one, 14, 15, 94,250, 90,750, 65,035, 3, 16, three

DATE: 1957, s. 2(m)(ii, 1897, 1904, under s. 2(m)(ii, years 1967-68, 1968-69, 1969-70, three assessment years

ORG: LIC, Insurance Corporation of India, LIC, LIC, LIC, WTO, Tribunal, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Mainland, falsi' (Equity, Wood Paving Corporation Ltd., AC 323, Tribunal, LIC, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal on the ground, WTO, LIC, LIC, Tribunal, the Life Insurance Corporation of India, LIC

NORP: American

ORDINAL: first

LANGUAGE: English

FAC: the W. T. Act, the W. T. Act