Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

R. Anandakumar and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Decided On : Mar-21-1989

Court : Chennai

LAW: section 54(1, section 34, section 17, section 65(3, section 17, section 17, section 34, the Estate Duty Act, Section 65 of the Act, section 65, section 17, section 65, section 17, section 17, section 65, section 65, section 31, section 65, section 31, section 65, section 65 of the Act, section 65(3, section 17, section 5, section 9, section 10, section 65(3, section 17(5)(a, section 17(5)(a, section 17(5)(a, section 65(3)(a, section 65(3, section 65(3)(a

ORG: Ratnam, Tuttapullam Estate, the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Act, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Reliance, Schedules, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, Department, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court

DATE: 1955, June 17, 1988, the assessment year 1984-85, December 31, 1984, January 17, 1985, January 21, 1985, January 25, 1985, March 26, 1985, December 15, 1987, June 17, 1988, the previous year, 66, 80J, 1964, '17, the previous year, the previous year, the previous year', a particular year

CARDINAL: one, two, 2, 37(4, 109, 3., 5, 1, 3, 4, 4, two, 3, 1963]47ITR522(Mad, 1, 3, 4, 2, 6., two, two, 1, 2, one

PERSON: S. Swaminathan, Gift, S. A. Balasubramaniam

WORK_OF_ART: K. Subbiah Gounder

ORDINAL: first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //