Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

In Re: S. Govind Swaminathan

Decided On : Aug-17-1954

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 7, Section 107, Section 108, Section 108, Section 47, Section 19, Section 47, Chapter seventy-eight, Section 47, Section 47, WN 152, Section 47, Section 47, Section 47, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Indian Penal Code', the Penal Code, Section 5, Section 1(2, Article 215, Constitution, the Criminal Procedure Code, Rule 52-F of the Defence of India, Clauses 22, Section 527, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code

ORG: ORDER1, the Second Criminal Sessions of the High Court, theContentions, the Amalgamation Ltd., the State Government under Section 17, Industrial Tribunal, State, Tribunal, Industrial Tribunal, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Bench, Bench, the State Prosecutor, Letters Patent Appeal No, the Advocate General, Advocate General, High Court, the Government of India Act, High Court, Division Court, the Government of India Act, High Court, Division Court, the Government of India Act, High Court, Division Court, Privy Council, the High Court, the Letters Patent, the High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Extraordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, the High Court, Jurisdiction, the High Court, Legislature, the High Court, Inherent Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Supreme Court, the High Court ', Exchequer, the High Court of Justice, the Common Pleas, the High Court, the Court of Appeal, Parnell, Cotton L.J., the Court of Appeal, Reg v. Steel', Court, Jurisdiction, the Privy Council, Kuchwar Lime, Stone Co. Ltd., the Judgment of the Privy Council, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Judicial Committee said,'Their Lordships, the High Court, the High Court, The High Courts, Presidencies, the High Court, Detmott, British Guiana', the Supreme Court, Pepsu High Court, Lordships, a High Court, Jurisdiction, the High Court, Letters Patent, the High Court, Letters, the High Court, the High Courts, The Supreme Court, the High Courts to Institute, AIR 1954, Incident, Lordships, the High Court, the High Court, the Letters Patent, Court, Letters, the High Court, the High Court, Council, the Judicial Committee, the High Court, the Privy Council, the High Court of Calcutta, the Privy Council, the High Court of Calcutta, the High Court, the Privy Council, Board said:'High, the High Court, Lordships, the High Court, the Letters Patent, the High Court, the High Court', Court, the High Court, Letters Patent, the Bombay High Court, Advocate General, Letters Patent, Court, the Letters Patent, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Jurisdiction, Court, Letters Patent, the Letters Patent, PI 241, English Courts, Courts, AIR, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1954, a High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the High Court of Pepsu, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Jurisdiction, Court, Court, Court, Court, Vide

PERSON: Mack, Justice Mack, Mack J., Subba Rao, Aiyar JJ, Jurisdiction, Tuljaram Bow, Alagappa Chettlar', Mack J., Admiralty, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Bhashyam Aryan-gar, Bench, O'Shea, O'Shea, O'shea, Butt J., L. J., Scott v. Scott', Vaughan William L. J., Reg, Russell C. J., Wilmot J., Rex V. Almon, S. N. Bannerjee v., Bashyam Aiyangar, Surendranath Banerjee, Barnes Peacock, Singh v. Chief Justice, Criminal P. C., Jurisdictions, Lordships, Jurisdictions, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Hamid Hasan, Banwarllal Roy, John Beaumont, Jurisdiction, Rex, Francis, Narayanarao, Solomon Moses', AIR1933Bom108, Rangnekar J., Beaumont C. J., Shyam Sundar, Jodhraj, Edgley J., Edgley J. At, Mukherjea J.: ', Gupta, continued:'It, Atul Chandra Gupta, Mukherjea J., Juridical, Tarit Kanti Biswas, Bhashyam Aiyangar, Criminal P. C., Bhashyam Aiyangar, Mrutyanjayudu AIR

CARDINAL: 30-4-1954, 15, 14, 14, 30-4-1954, 30-4-1854, 30-4-1954, 113, 5, 9, one, one, one, one, two, 15, 12, 17, 18, 29, 33, 34, two, 15, enactments.13, 66, five, one, two, 1890, 15, 100, 2, 20, 832, 243, 1, 10, 5, 29, one, more than one, one, 22, three, 2, 280, 15, 400, 29, 29, 1912, two, 41, 29, 8, 527, one, two

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras

DATE: 1947, 1947, Friday, this - day, 30th April and 1st May 1954, 30th April, that day, Monday, May 1954, the previous court day, 1954, the 1st day of February 1929, '14, 1873, 1913, 1876, 37, 1888, 1888, 1873, '15, 1765, 1911, 1873, 1873, a period of two months, 1882, 1868, 1882, 1954, 1865, 1919, 1947 PC 90, one year, as long ago as, 1788, 1788, 1890, 1912 PD 241, a period of, two weeks, the year 1919, the year 1919, 1890, 15 PD 69, 1943

WORK_OF_ART: The Madras Mail', 35 Mad 1, Jurisdiction by Clause 11 of the Letters Patent

NORP: Sessions, English, British

ORDINAL: 3rd, first, secondly, first, eleventh, eleventh, first, first, second, first, first, first

GPE: Panchapakesa, England, Wilmot C. J., Wilmot, Seldon, England, England, England, England, India, England, India, England, Record, Bengal, Howrah, Halsbury, India, Judges

EVENT: Clause 15, Clause 15, Clauses 22 to 29, Clause 15, Clause 15, PD 59, Clause 25, Clause 15, Clause 25

FAC: Madras, Clauses 22 to

PRODUCT: Judgment, the Full Bench, Calcutta

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //