Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Gowrishankar Damani

Decided On : Sep-14-1976

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 64(1, the Estate Duty Act, the Estate Duty Act, Section 12, Section 60(2, Section 10 or Section 12, Section 60(1)(c, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 60(1)(c, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 28(l)(c, Section 28, Section 28(l)(c)of, Section 16(3, Section 16(3)(a)(i, Section 16(3)(a)(ii, Section 16(3)(a)(iv, Section 28(l)(c, Section 16(3, Section 28(1, Section 22(1, Section 28(l)(c, Section 28(l)(c, Section 28(1, Section 60(1)(c, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 60(1)(c, Section 10 of the Act, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 60(1)(c, Section 34(l)(a, Section 16(3, Section 22, Section 16(3)(a)(ii, Section 16(3, Section 34(l)(a).'17, the Estate Duty Act, Section 22, Section 12, Section 12, Section 7 of the Act, Section 12, Section 12(1, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 60(1)(c

PERSON: Ismail, Madras Bench, Lakshmi Bai, Shri Gowrishankar Damani, Controller, Madras Bench, V. S. Arulanandam v. Commissioner of Income, Jayaraman, V. D. M. RM, Chettiar

NORP: J.1, penalty--, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

DATE: 1953, October 19, 1966, June 15, 1967, May 23, 1945, July 29, 1967, May 23, 1945, May 23, 1945, July 29, 1967, more than 2 years, January 31, 1968, July 16, 1968, 25th August, 1970, Section 60(l)(c, 1922, 1922, 1922, 1922, ' 16, 1922, 1922, 1922, 28(l)(c, '12, 19, 18, ' 18, ' 19, 1922.Section 34(l)(a, 1922, that year, the relevant years, 1922, that year, that year

ORG: the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Controller of Estate Duty, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Controller, the Appellate Tribunal, Section 60(1)(c, Tribunal, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, Bench, Act, Section 60(1)(c, inaccount(s)No, Income-taxOfficer, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Act, Act.18, Tribunal, the Controller of Estate Duty

CARDINAL: 2, 77,393, 98, 1,51,593, 3,000, 1,500, 6, two, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, one, 2, 1, two, half, 9, One, 3, 10, 1968]67ITR305(Mad, 18, 19, 10, 19, two, two, two, 19, 15, 1969]74ITR183(SC, One, 19, 19(a, 19(a, 500, five hundred

EVENT: E.D. 1-A Form

FAC: Mint Street

LOC: Madras, Madras

ORDINAL: third, first

TIME: under this Act

PRODUCT: Section 60(1)(c, Section 60(1)(c

GPE: Clauses

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //