Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Gowrishankar Damani
Decided On : Sep-14-1976
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 64(1, the Estate Duty Act, the Estate Duty Act, Section 12, Section 60(2, Section 10 or Section 12, Section 60(1)(c, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 60(1)(c, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 28(l)(c, Section 28, Section 28(l)(c)of, Section 16(3, Section 16(3)(a)(i, Section 16(3)(a)(ii, Section 16(3)(a)(iv, Section 28(l)(c, Section 16(3, Section 28(1, Section 22(1, Section 28(l)(c, Section 28(l)(c, Section 28(1, Section 60(1)(c, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 60(1)(c, Section 10 of the Act, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 60(1)(c, Section 34(l)(a, Section 16(3, Section 22, Section 16(3)(a)(ii, Section 16(3, Section 34(l)(a).'17, the Estate Duty Act, Section 22, Section 12, Section 12, Section 7 of the Act, Section 12, Section 12(1, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 60(1)(c
PERSON: Ismail, Madras Bench, Lakshmi Bai, Shri Gowrishankar Damani, Controller, Madras Bench, V. S. Arulanandam v. Commissioner of Income, Jayaraman, V. D. M. RM, Chettiar
NORP: J.1, penalty--, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian
DATE: 1953, October 19, 1966, June 15, 1967, May 23, 1945, July 29, 1967, May 23, 1945, May 23, 1945, July 29, 1967, more than 2 years, January 31, 1968, July 16, 1968, 25th August, 1970, Section 60(l)(c, 1922, 1922, 1922, 1922, ' 16, 1922, 1922, 1922, 28(l)(c, '12, 19, 18, ' 18, ' 19, 1922.Section 34(l)(a, 1922, that year, the relevant years, 1922, that year, that year
ORG: the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Controller of Estate Duty, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Controller, the Appellate Tribunal, Section 60(1)(c, Tribunal, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, Bench, Act, Section 60(1)(c, inaccount(s)No, Income-taxOfficer, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Act, Act.18, Tribunal, the Controller of Estate Duty
CARDINAL: 2, 77,393, 98, 1,51,593, 3,000, 1,500, 6, two, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, one, 2, 1, two, half, 9, One, 3, 10, 1968]67ITR305(Mad, 18, 19, 10, 19, two, two, two, 19, 15, 1969]74ITR183(SC, One, 19, 19(a, 19(a, 500, five hundred
EVENT: E.D. 1-A Form
FAC: Mint Street
LOC: Madras, Madras
ORDINAL: third, first
TIME: under this Act
PRODUCT: Section 60(1)(c, Section 60(1)(c
GPE: Clauses