Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajah Kocherlakota Venkata Jagannadha Rao Garu Vs. Maharajah Ravu Venkata Kumara Mahipati Surya Rao Bahadur Zamindar Garu and ors.

Decided On : May-01-1930

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 2, Section 54, Section 54, the Abkari Act, Section 2, the Abkari Act, the Contract Act, Article 5, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 118, Section 118, Section 59, Section 68 of the Evidence Act, Section 68, the Indian Contract Act, Section 54, Section 118 of the Act, Section 68, the Contract Act, the Hindu Law

PERSON: Horace Owen Compton Beasley, Rajah, lien, B. Venkata Rao, Prakka Subramaniam, B. Venkata Rao, Venkata Buchayamraa, Venkata Buchayamma, Buchayamma, Chengalva Kondayya, Buchayamma, Venkata Rao, Rani, Rani, Rani, Rani, Rani, lien, Rangachari, Pillai, Badrakali Ammal, Walter Schwabe, J., Hutchins, J., Art, Govind I.L.R., J., Veetil Muthalakulangara, Kunhu Moidu, Thyruthipalli Madhava Menon, M.L.T., Ramajogayya, Jagannadhan I.L.R., Seshagiri Aiyar, John Wallis, John Wallis, Seshagiri Aiyar, J., J., Rangachari, Bismanath Prasad, Chandra Narayan Chowdhry, Rani, lien, Madhawa Deo, Seshagiri Aiyar, J., Rajah, Ramnad, Sundara Pandiaswami, Ramnad, Sundara Pandiaswami Thevar, Pillai, Badrakali Ammal, lien, Veetil Muthalakulangara, Kunhu Moidu, Thiruthipalli Madhava Menon, Ramajogayya, Jagannadhan I.L.R., Rajsanji, Shekh Masludin, John Wallis, J., Seshagiri Aiyar, J.

GPE: Kt., Ex, Uttamchand, Pidaka, India, Curgenven, J.12, Narayana, Pulaka, Waghela, Judges, A.S.

CARDINAL: 409, 1925.--The, 1,88,487-15, 446, one, 1,39,986-1, 1, 2, 3, two, Two, two, Two, 1, 2, 612, 42, 410, 617, 141, 142, 696, eight, 2, two, one, 1,39,986-1, more than three, less than half, one, half, one, 1,39,000, 410, 19, 185, 36, 517, two, 1, Only one, two, 1, 2, 7, 7, 612, 42, 410, 7, 1.40, 3, 410, 19, 185, 36, two, One, two, 452, 1925.--In, 409

DATE: the 29th of November, 1920, the 14th of December, 1920, 1926, the 1st, 1926, the 1st, 1922, 1885, 1901, 1899, 89, 1909, 584, 1918, the 1st, 29th November, the 14th December, 1922, the 1st, the 1st, the six years, 1909, 1918, 1925

ORG: Polavaram, the Rajah of Polavaram, Court, Court, Polavaram, Court, Chengalva Kondayya, Kandukuri Subbayya, Appayya, sec, Dasi, Dasi, Chengalva Kondayya, the Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, Kondayya, the Transfer of Property (Amendment, Advocate-General, Polavaram, Court, Sale, Chandavarkar, Benjamin on Sale, 4th Edition, Legislature, the Transfer of Property, the Rajah of Polavaram of Rs, Polavaram, Court, Advocate-General, the Rajah of Polavaram, the Advocate-General, Court, Court, the Privy Council, the Trial Court, the High Court of Calcutta, the Privy Council, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Dasi, Polavaram, Privy Council, Wallis, Offg, the Privy Council, Lordships, Court, Advocate-General, Court, charge.19, Privy Council, Lord.22

ORDINAL: 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 6th, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, second, 1st, 1st, 1st, first, 1st, 1st, second, 1st

MONEY: 9 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: Dasis, The Queen-Empress v.

PRODUCT: Venkata, a Full Bench, a Full Bench, a Full Bench, another Full Bench

NORP: Hindu, Hindu, Venetian

FAC: the Transfer of Property Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //