Paluri Venkatasiva Rao Vs. Bodapati Venkatanarasimha Satyanarayanamurthy and ors.

Decided On : Mar-21-1932

Court : Chennai

LAW: Defendant 1, Section 7(iv, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(v, Section 7(v, Section 7(iv-A, Defendant 1, Section 7(iv-A., Article 91 of the Limitation Act ', Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(iv)(c, Section 7(iv)(c, Article 17, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(v, Section 7(v, Section 7(iv)(c, Section 7, the Full Bench, the Court Fees Act, Section 7(v, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7, Clause, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(v, Section 7(iv)(c, Section 7(iv)(c, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(iv)(c, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(iv)(c, Section 7(iv)(c).13, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(iv, Section 7(iv)(c, Section 7(iv, Section 7(iv, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(iv-A, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 92 of the present Limitation Act, Section 7(iv-A, Section 7(v

PERSON: J.1, Bhimavaram, Somasundaram, Ramesam, Vishnu Nambudri, Ramesam, J., Flower, Lloyd, Roy, Khagendra Nath Mahata, Pran Nath Roy, Barnes Peacock, Nilmoney, Puddo Lochun, Srinivasa Aiyangar, J., Arunachellam, Sabapathy I.L.R., Manohar Lal v. Jadunath Singh, L.R., Suryanarayana, Madarsa Rowther, Boddam, Aiyangar, Somasundaram, Rajagopala, Vijayaraghavalu I.L.R., Tyabji, Madarsa Rowther, Arunachalam Chetty, Rangaswami Pillai, Somasundaram, Somasundaram, Anantakrishna Aiyar, J.8, Ramesam, Vishnu Nambudri, Bhimavaram, Subordinate, Somasundaram, Ramesam, Vishnu Nam-budri, Ramesam, J., Abdul Huq Chozvdhury, Abdul Hafez, Nilmoney, Puddo Lochun, Barnes Peacock, Krishna bhupati v. Raniamurti I.L.R., Arunachellam, Sabapathy I.L.R., Roy, Khagendra Nath Mahata, Pran Nath Roy, Jalandhar Thakur, Jharula Das, Ramesam, Plaintiff, Balakrishna, Vishnu Nambudri, Manohar Lal v. Jadunath Singh, L.R., K. Srinivasa Aiyangar, J., Arunachellam, Sabapathy I.L.R., Abdul Huq Chowdhury, Abdul Hafes, Madarsa Rowther, Rajagopala, Vijayaraghavalu I.L.R., Rangaswami Pillai, Venkatanarasimha Raju v. Chandrayya

ORG: Civil Revision Petition, the Additional District Munsif of, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, O.S. No, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, plaintiffs;and, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Lordships of the Privy Council, Plaintiff, Radha Raman Shaha, Plaintiff, the Privy Council, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the' Court Fees Act, Legislature, Legislature, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, I.L.R., Legislature, I.L.R., Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, this Civil Revision Petition, Bench, Plaintiff, the Sub-Court, the Additional District Munsif of, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Court Fees Act, the Court Fees Act, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, this Civil Revision Petition, the Madras Court, Legislature, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Story's Equity Pleadings, Seton on Decrees, Daniel's Chancery Practice, Flower v. Lloyd, Plaintiff, the Privy Council, Radha Raman Shaha, the Indian Courts, Legislature, J., the Court Fees Act, Legislature, Plaintiff, the Privy Council, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Lower Court, Plaintiff, Court, I.L.R., Plaintiff, the Court Fees Act, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Lower Court, Plaintiff, the Court Fees, this Civil Revision Petition

GPE: O.S., England, England, P.C., P.C., J.J., Narsapur, O.S., O.S., fort, England, India, England, Hals, India, India, P.C., P.C., Mookerjee, Chinnam, Arunachalam, Krishnan

CARDINAL: 302, 302, 509, thatin, one, 6, 297 two, 475, 5, 20, 41, 213, 33, 128, 585, 16, 480, 14, 343, 38, 922, 28, 922, 28, 118, less than half, less than half, 509.8, 11, 302, 302, more than one-half, 509, 510, 421, 426, 428, 189, 13, 352, 490, 6, 297, 6, 297, 11, 16, 198, 213, 33, 499, 475, 509, 33, 128, 585, 16, 213, 33, 11, two, 480, 14, 922, 28, 118, less than half, one, 53, 267, 10, 15

DATE: 1916, 1922, 1916, 1930, 1859, 1877, 1901, 1866, 1866, 1917, 1906, 1903, 1914, 1903, 1914, 1922, the end of Section 7(iv, 5 weeks, 1930, 1930, the present 1st, 1916, 1916, 1922, 1922, 1930, 1332, 1877, 1877, 1866, 1910, 1892, 1917, 1901, 1922, 1930, 1922, 1922, 1906, 1917, 1910, 1903, 1914, 38 Mad, 1184, 1914, 1922, 1926, 1922, 1859, 1908

WORK_OF_ART: Defendant 1, 27 Mad, 27 Mad, 38 Mad, Subordinate, Subordinate, 41 Mad, 41 Mad, 27 Mad, 38 Mad

FAC: Balakrishna Nair, Balakrishna Nair, Balakrishna Nair

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, second, second, second, first, second, second, first, first, second, first, first, second

MONEY: 499

NORP: Chinnammal, Chinnammal, Indian

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, Malabar, the Full Bench

EVENT: Clause - Section 7(iv-A

LANGUAGE: English