Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jag Narayan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Decided On : Nov-24-2016

Court : Jharkhand

LAW: Rule 55, Rule 55, Rule 43, Rule 43, Rule 43, Rule 43, Rule 43, Rule 139, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.7, Article 311 of the Constitution of India, Rule 55, Rule 43, Rule 43 and Rule 139, Rule 43, Rule 43, Rule 55

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 14/24.11.2016, 22.07.2008, 3, 4, 30.06.2008, 22.07.2008, 3, 55, 22.07.2008, 1, 2, 22.07.2008, 30.06.2008, 22.07.2008, 3, 3, 9, 07.04.1993, 3, 9, 22.07.2008, 12, 4, 30.06.2008, 9 and 12, 106/87-88,229/87-88, 668, 06, 24.03.2005, 5, 6 8, 30.06.2008, 55, 139, 7, 139, 22.07.2008, 8, 3, 22.07.2008, 22.07.2008

ORG: W.P., Prasad Bhawan, Nilanchal Compound, Sukhdeo Nagar, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 2, Administrative Reforms, Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Administrative Reforms, Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Administrative Reforms, Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, inter alia, Circular, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rules, Circular, Combined Competitive Examination, the Bihar Public Service Commission, the Bihar Administrative Service Cadre, Circular, Government, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rules, Circular, the Disciplinary Authority, the Jharkhand Pension Rule, Circular, Court, No.4601, Court, the Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, Respondents, the Pension Rules, the Jharkhand Pension Rules, the Jharkhand Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, Apex Court, State of Bihar, Delhi Development Authority-versus-H.C. Khurana, Government, the Privy Council, Apex Court, the Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, Respondents, the Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, Jharkhand Administrative Service, Revenue, Land Reforms Department, Circle Officer, the Urban Land Ceiling Act, the Conducting Officer, the Jharkhand Pension Rules.6, the Respondent-State, the Pension Rules, Court, Court, Government, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rule, Circular, the Mutation Order of, Government, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rules, Government, the Pension Rules, the Bihar Pension Rules, The State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Pension Rules, the Bihar Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, Court, Apex Court, State of Bihar, 06.08.2011 (Annexure-4, the Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, APK

DATE: 2011, 4538, 1930, 4601, 22nd, 1930, 16.09.2011, 16.09.2011, the year 1986-87-88, 1995, 14.03.2005, 1240 of 1993, 1993, 14.03.2005, 4 years, 5087, 436/86-87, 298/85-86, 14.03.2005, 27.10.2010, 14.03.2005, 14.03.2005, 1930, the year 1986, 1987 and, 1988, 1930, more than four years, four years, the year 1986, 1987 and, 1988, 1930, the year 2010, 1995, 16 weeks

PERSON: Jag Narayan Singh, Ram Keshwar Singh, Petitioners, Saurabh Shekhar, Anoop Agrawal, S.C. V., Supp, Idris Ansari, Nazir Ahmad-Vs.-Emperor, Gari, Anoop Agrawal, Idris Ansari, Supp, Pramath Patnaik

GPE: Ratu Road, Project Bhawan, Project Bhawan, Project Bhawan, Ranchi, J.C., Jharkhand, Ranchi, Ranchi, Ranchi, NC, J.C., S.C.

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second

PRODUCT: 06.08.2011, 06.08.2011, 06.08.2011, Rule 139 (b

MONEY: 20 per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //