Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Province of Madras, Represented by the Collector of Madras Vs. R.B. Poddar Firm Through Its Managing Partner, Motilal Fomra

Decided On : Sep-03-1947

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 80, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, the Indian Railways Act, Section 80, Section 80.6, Section 80

PERSON: Govinda Menon, Ezra, Pleader, I.L.R., Madras, Vellayan Chettiar, Raghunandan Shenoy, AIR1947Mad64, Vellayan Chettiar, V.V., Aiyangar, Ezra, Chandra Nandi, Ashutosh Mukherjee, J., V.V. Srinivasa, Aiyangar, Chinta Chandramma, Gunna Sethan Naidu, Mohamad Esuf Rowther, Rajamannar, Ramaswami Jadaya Goundan, V.V. Srinivasa, Aiyangar

NORP: J.1

GPE: O.S., acquisition.3, P.C., Al, Manindra, I.A.

CARDINAL: 67, 19, two, 53, 725, 2, 2, 208, 36, 257, 797, 61, 30, 98

ORG: the Sub-Court, Madura, the Provincial Government, Madura, Provincial Government, Bank, Ltd., State, Court, amendment4, Court, Court, Court, Notice, Government, Bhagchand, Dagdusa, State, the Privy Council, The Government of the Province of, Court, Court, the Central Government, Government, Council, The Government of the Province of, Lordships of the Judicial Committee, State, State, Mcinerny, State, Court, Court, Court, Court, Ibramsa Rowther, L.W. 557, I.C. 867, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court

WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate, I.L.R.(1902) Cal, I.L.R.(1902) Cal, Subordinate

PRODUCT: Madura

DATE: 36, only 60 days, 1927, 1944, 1947, 1930, 1929, 1926

FAC: Elaya Filial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //