Semantic Analysis by spaCy
The Province of Madras, Represented by the Collector of Madras Vs. R.B. Poddar Firm Through Its Managing Partner, Motilal Fomra
Decided On : Sep-03-1947
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 80, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, the Indian Railways Act, Section 80, Section 80.6, Section 80
PERSON: Govinda Menon, Ezra, Pleader, I.L.R., Madras, Vellayan Chettiar, Raghunandan Shenoy, AIR1947Mad64, Vellayan Chettiar, V.V., Aiyangar, Ezra, Chandra Nandi, Ashutosh Mukherjee, J., V.V. Srinivasa, Aiyangar, Chinta Chandramma, Gunna Sethan Naidu, Mohamad Esuf Rowther, Rajamannar, Ramaswami Jadaya Goundan, V.V. Srinivasa, Aiyangar
NORP: J.1
GPE: O.S., acquisition.3, P.C., Al, Manindra, I.A.
CARDINAL: 67, 19, two, 53, 725, 2, 2, 208, 36, 257, 797, 61, 30, 98
ORG: the Sub-Court, Madura, the Provincial Government, Madura, Provincial Government, Bank, Ltd., State, Court, amendment4, Court, Court, Court, Notice, Government, Bhagchand, Dagdusa, State, the Privy Council, The Government of the Province of, Court, Court, the Central Government, Government, Council, The Government of the Province of, Lordships of the Judicial Committee, State, State, Mcinerny, State, Court, Court, Court, Court, Ibramsa Rowther, L.W. 557, I.C. 867, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court
WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate, I.L.R.(1902) Cal, I.L.R.(1902) Cal, Subordinate
PRODUCT: Madura
DATE: 36, only 60 days, 1927, 1944, 1947, 1930, 1929, 1926
FAC: Elaya Filial