Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Assistant Collector of Customs (imports) Vs. Sundaram Textiles

Decided On : Jul-17-1989

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Customs Tariff Act, Chapter 56, Section 32(1, Section 3, the Customs Tariff Act 1976, chapter 56, Section 3 of the Act, Section 32(C, the Finance Act, Section 3, the Customs Tariff Act, the Customs Tariff Act, the Customs Act, Chapter 56, Section 3 of the Act, Section 32(1, the Finance Act, Chapter 38, Chapter 56', Section 32, Section 35(4, the Finance Act, Section 3, the Customs Tariff Act, the Exemption Notifications Nos, the Customs Tariff Act

PERSON: ORDERPadmini Jesudurai, Clan Magnair, Notifications Nos, Law, L.R. 380, Notification Nos, Notification Nos, Notifications Nos

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: two, 2., 3, 142, 48, 4, 4, 2, 385, 23, 31-12-1978, two, 6, 7, 5, 8, 5, 1.32, 4, 4, 7, two, 4., 4, 5, 6, 1985(21)ELT369(Mad, 1987(28)ELT266(Mad, 4, 388, 2-8-1976, 31-12-1978, 385, 23, 31-12-1978, 5, 6, 8, 6, 7, 1.32, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8, 4, 5, 6, 9

GPE: India, W.A., W.A., the United Kingdom, U.K., India, India, Shahwney v. Sulvania, Shahwney v. Sylvania, India

ORG: W.P. 298 of 1979, W.P. 459 of 1979, W.P. 298 of 1979, W.P. 459 of 1979, the Government of India, Ministry of Finance Department, Department of Revenue, the Central Government, The Government of India, Customs, the Bombay High Court, Laxman - LXXVII Bom, the Union of India, Court, Jamal Co. v. Union of India, the Bombay High Court, Laxman - 78 Bom, Lucas TVS Ltd., Asstt, Customs, Customs, Customs, the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, the Customs Tariff Act

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, second, first, first, first, first

DATE: 1982, 7-12-1978, 8-12-1979, 13-12-1978, 7-12-1978, 1975, 1976, 7-12-1978, 1975, 7, both days, 1975, 1975, 7, 8.

LOC: Madras, North Quay

MONEY: 100 per cent, 20 per cent, 20 per cent, 20 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: 2 Notification No.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //