F.K. Hasheeb and Co. Vs. the State of Madras

Decided On : Aug-19-1964

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 16, Section 32, Section 61 of the Act of, the Amendment Act, Section 16 of the Act, Section 32, Section 34, Section 9 of the Act of 1939, Section 11, Section 12, Section 16, Section 16 of the Act of, Section 12 of the 1939 Act, Section 32 of the Act of, Section 12, Section 14, Section 15, Section 16, Section 33, Section 16, Section 16, Section 32, Section 16 and Section 32, Section 16, Section 32, Section 16, Section 32, Section 16, Section 32, Section 16 of the Act, Rule 14, the Full Bench, Rule 17, Section 34, Section 34, the Sales Tax Act, Rule 17, Section 34, Rule 17, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Rule 14(2, Rule 17(1, Rule 14(2, Rule 17, Section 16, Section 34, Section 32, Section 32, Section 16, Section 32, Section 16, Section 1 1-A of that Act, Section 11-A, Section 11, Section 34, Section 34(1, Section 14, Section 11-A of the Act, Section 11-A of the Act, Section 34, Section 16, Section 34(1)(b, Section 26, Section 26 of the Act, Section 26 of the Act, Section 17, Section 34, Section 16, Section 11-A of the C.P., Section 16, Section 32, Section 34, Section 16, Section 32, Section 16, Section 32, Section 16 and Section 32, Section 16, Section 32, Rule 17, Rule 17, Section 32, Section 16, Section 32, Section 32, Section 12, Section 9, Rule 17, Rule 17, Section 12(2, Section 12, Section 16, Section 32, Section 12(7, Section 23(3, Section 23(3).33, the Orissa Act, Section 23, Section 23(3, Section 3, Section 23(3, Section 23(3, Section 12(7, Section 23(3, Section 12(7, Section 23(3, Section 23(3).35, Section 32, Section 32, Section 16.36, Section 12(2, the Madras Act, Section 32, Section 32

ORG: ORDERRamamurti, Bench, Noor Mohammed & Co., the Madras High Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, State, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, State, Madras, Louis Dreyfus & Co. Ltd., I.L.R., the Supreme Court, the Bihar Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Supreme Court, State, Madras, Louis Dreyfus & Co. Ltd., I.L.R., State, Madras, Louis Dreyfus & Co., Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Madras General Sales Tax Rules, the Supreme Court, C.P., Berar Sales Tax Act, State, Madras, Louis Dreyfus & Co., Ltd., the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Appellate Tribunal, Government, the Madras General Sales Tax Rules, a Civil Court, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, State, Louis Dreyfus.& Co., Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, Madras, Louis Dreyfus & Co., Ltd., State, State, Reliance, Court, Abdul Kadir Maraktyar & Co., the Privy Council, the Madras General Sales Tax Rules, the Commercial Tax, Advocate-General, State, Advocate-General, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, C.P., Berar Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Business Profits Tax Act, Court, the Supreme Court, the Madras General Sales Tax Rules, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Patna High Court, the Privy Council, the Patna High Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Patna High Court, Patna High Court, the Privy Council, the Bihar Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Section, Section, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Maharaj, the Supreme Court, Chatturam Horilram Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Berar Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sections 16, the Supreme Court, Bench, G.O. 193, Legislature, the Supreme Court, State, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Orissa Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, the Assistant Collector of Sales Tax, The Supreme Court, the State of Orissa, the High Court, the High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Berar Oil Industries, State, the Madras General Sales Tax Rules, Bench, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Act.39

NORP: J.1, Maharajadhiraj, Rules, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Maharajadhiraj, Indian, Indian, Maharajadhiraj, Maharajadhiraj, Indian, Rules 17(1

DATE: 22nd October, 1959, 1959, the assessment year 1954-55, 22nd October, 1959, 1962, 1962, the year 1954-55, a period of, three years, 1954-55, the expiry of 31st March, 1958, three years, 30th March, 1957, 1st April, 1957, five years, the year 1954-55, 1st April, 1960, 22nd October, 1959, 1959, 1959, 1959, 1959, 1963, 1963, 1956, 1285, 1959]37ITR388(SC, 1938, 1960, 3rd April, 1963, 1962, 56, 1963, 8th July, 1963, 1956, 1285, 1956, 1285, 1958, 1302, 1939, 1964, 1947, 1956, 1285, 1939, 1959, 1939, 1939, 1939, any year, three years, 1957, three to five years, 1959, 1959, five years, the expiry of the year, 1959, more than four years, 1956, 1285, 1956, 1285, 1925, 1938, Rule 17, the two Rules 14(2, Rule 14(2, 1964]51ITR557(SC, 1947, three calendar years, October, 1950, the year 1949-50, October, 1949 to 9th November, 1950, one quarter, the other quarters, 13th August, 1954, the other three quarters, the period of, three years, 1959]37ITR388(SC, a year, 1951-52, that year, 1948, succeed.25, 1959]37ITR388(SC, 1938, any financial year, one year, 1964]51ITR557(SC, 1959]37ITR388(SC, 56, 58 of 1963, 32, 1962, 28th January, 1954, five years, 1947, 36 months of the end of the period, 1417, 1960, the same year

GPE: Madras City, Srinivasan, Venkatadri, JJ, Jagadisan, Venkatadri, JJ, I.L.R., Kerala, Appukutty, Kerala, I.L.R., S.C., I.L.R., Madras v., I.L.R., I.L.R., Bombay, The State of Madras, Singh, Jagadisan, Venkatadri, JJ, Srinivasan, Venkatadri, JJ, Kerala, Orissa v. Debaki, Akola, I.L.R.

CARDINAL: 12,866-7-7, 1956]7, 1, 148, 1, 148, 4,87,826, two, 1959]35ITR1(SC, 345, 348, two, one, 85, 58, two, 17(1, Two, 17(1, 1, 1-A, 2, 1, 1, half, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, two, two, 14, 17, 15, 17(1, 1296:-The, 22, 6, 414, two, one, 17(1, 1295):The, 17, only one, two, 17(1, 17(1, 1, two, two, two, two, 1, 23, Two, 1959]35ITR1(SC, 770, two, three, three, 23, two, 1959]35ITR1(SC, 261, 2, 1959]35ITR1(SC, 1955]27ITR709(SC, 1959]35ITR1(SC, two, two, 1959]35ITR1(SC, two, 85, 3A, 1, 3, 17, 3A, two, two, 1-A, 3-A, two, 799, one, 1 7, 2, 17(1, 17(3, 1964]5SCR253, Two, 5, two, 1, three, 222, 14

PERSON: S.T.C. 792, Madras, M. A. Noor Mohammed & Co., Madras, M. A. Noor Mohammed & Co., Madras, Bat, George Gazette, Kameshwar Singh, Maharajkumar v. Income-tax Commissioner, Veera, J., Ghanshyamdas, suo motu, suo motu, necessary.(2, J(4, I.L.R., Madras, Khemchand Ramdas, Rule 17(1, Rule 17(1, Ghanshyamdas, Ghanshyamdas, Kameshwar Singh, Kameshwar Singh v. State, Ghanshyamdas, Maharaj Kumar, Kameswhar Singh, Bench, suo motuor, Subject, Government Pleader

TIME: under this Act, the earlier Act and

PRODUCT: Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, 710, the Full Bench, Rule 17(1, Rule 17(1, Rule 17(1, Rule 17(1, Rule 17(1, Rule 17(1, Rule 17(1, Rule 17(1, The Full Bench, Rule 17(1, The Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, a Full Bench, Rule 17(1, the Full Bench, Rule 17(1, Rule 14-A

WORK_OF_ART: Tax Case No., Raja of Parlakimidi, Tax Case No.

ORDINAL: first, first, first, 5th, first, second, first, first

FAC: the Andhra Pradesh High Court