Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mr.Dilvar Singh Vs. Ministry of Railways

Decided On : Oct-11-2011

Court : Central Information Commission CIC

PERSON: Dyc Hkou, OldÂ, Singh PWIÂ, Nizamuddin, TheÂ, receivedÂ, aÂ, datedÂ, theÂ, RTIÂ, avoidÂ, theÂ, ,Â, theÂ, RTIÂ, aÂ, to theÂ, CPIOÂ, aÂ, to theÂ, a copyÂ, to theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, fileÂ, IfÂ, theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, IfÂ, theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, DirectionsÂ, theÂ, from , theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, RTI Act.3, theÂ, theÂ, theÂ, Commissionâ€, Dixit, TheÂ, Delhi.3.Â

ORG: Post Office, Campus ubZ fnYyh, CIC/AD/C/2011/000686 Complainant, Singh S/o ShriÂ, lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents, PIO, DRM Office, Railway, Railway, DRM  Office, CPIOÂ, withinÂ, withinÂ, withinÂ

CARDINAL: ts-,u-;w-, 110067F.No, 30.9.2010, 2.Â, 1stÂ, 19(3)Â, 18,Â, 4.WithÂ, 2

DATE: 110067

GPE: Delhi, Delhi, complainantÂ, Delhi, Delhi

QUANTITY: 30.9.2010 from ShriÂ

MONEY: 30.9.2010Â

NORP: G.Subramanian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //