Nallammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Decided On : Sep-05-1989

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 32 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution

PERSON: Arunachalam, Goondas, R. Manickam, T. Kalaimani, Rudul Sah, Bhim Singh, MLA, District Magistrate, Beed, Mohd, Ibrahim Mohd, Sasin, Francis Corolie Mullin's, Sebastian Hongray v.

ORG: Manickam, the Central Ex-Prison, the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Immoral Traffic Offenders and, XIV, Court, Court, the Tamil Nadu Government, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Court of Session, the Sessions Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the Legislative Assembly, Magistrate, Lalitha, CLJ, Court, State, Court, State, State, Court, State, State, Court, the Supreme Court, Maharashtra 1987 SCC, the State Government, Court, the Supreme Court, the Advisory Board, Union of India, Court, Court, Court, State, the State Government

GPE: Salem, goonda, Bihar, Art

ORDINAL: second, first, second, second, first

DATE: 1982, 18-11-1987, 29-11-1988, two weeks, two weeks, 14-10-1987, 14-10-1988, 1989, 18-11-1987, 14-10-1988, 29-11-1988, 18-10-1988, 14-10-1988, 1989, 1989, 1732, today

CARDINAL: 2, 25, 14-6-1988, 3, 23, 2229, 14-6-1988, 4, 1983CriLJ1644, 3-6-1968, 16-10-1982, 30,000/-, 5,000, 5, 1986CriLJ192, 21, 5A, 9, 3, 6, 6, 1987]3SCR668, 22(5, 630, two, 8), 1981CriLJ306, 9, 1984CriLJ830, 10, 11

TIME: 9-1-1989