Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Gariba and anr. Vs. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and ors.
Decided On : Aug-08-2001
Court : Rajasthan
LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution, Order 23 Rule 3, Order 23 Rule 3, the Motor Vehicles Act, Article 12 of the Constitution, Order 23 Rule 3, the Advocates Act
PERSON: S.K. Keshote, Heard Learned Counsels, Dholpur, Pinky, Nos, Pinky, Kumari Pinky, Kumari Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Learned Counsels, Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Kumari Pinky
NORP: J.1
ORG: the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the United India Insurance Company Ltd., Tribunal, the Learned Counsel, The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court, the United India Insurance Company, State, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Counsel of the Insurance Company, Court, Learned Counsel, Court, United India Insurance Company, Court, the Insurance Company, Bar
CARDINAL: 2, 3, one, 16.9.2000, 2,000/-toward, 2,000/-, 10/-, 21, 500/-, 2,000/-, 2, 1
GPE: Soha, C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C.
ORDINAL: second, first, second
DATE: these days, 25/- + 1 + 2