Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gariba and anr. Vs. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and ors.

Decided On : Aug-08-2001

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution, Order 23 Rule 3, Order 23 Rule 3, the Motor Vehicles Act, Article 12 of the Constitution, Order 23 Rule 3, the Advocates Act

PERSON: S.K. Keshote, Heard Learned Counsels, Dholpur, Pinky, Nos, Pinky, Kumari Pinky, Kumari Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Learned Counsels, Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Pinky, Kumari Pinky

NORP: J.1

ORG: the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the United India Insurance Company Ltd., Tribunal, the Learned Counsel, The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court, the United India Insurance Company, State, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Counsel of the Insurance Company, Court, Learned Counsel, Court, United India Insurance Company, Court, the Insurance Company, Bar

CARDINAL: 2, 3, one, 16.9.2000, 2,000/-toward, 2,000/-, 10/-, 21, 500/-, 2,000/-, 2, 1

GPE: Soha, C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C.

ORDINAL: second, first, second

DATE: these days, 25/- + 1 + 2

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //