Khayali Lal and anr. Vs. Isamiya and ors.

Decided On : Nov-01-2007

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 2, Order 41, Rule 22, Section II(1)(i, Section II(1)(ii, Section 94, the Motor Vehicles Act, Chapter VIII, Section 95 of the Act, Section II, Section 95, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95, Section 95, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section II, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 95, the Motor Vehicles Act

PERSON: Munishwar Nath Bhandari, Udaipur, Kalu Miya, Kalu Miya, Deepali Brahma, Darshan Singh, Santra Devi v. Hari Singh Pratap Singh, Nos, Counsel, Nos, Shanti Bai's, Lal Sood's, Lal Sood's, Shanti Bai, Lal Sood, Kaushalya Devi Thapar 1, Lal Sood, Kishan Sarup Thapar, Keshav Bahadur, Jugal Kishore, Jugal Kishore's, Keshav Bahadur, provisos, of(i, Deepali Brahma, Darshan Singh, Santra Devi v. Hari Singh Pratap Singh, wherein, Keshav Bahadur

NORP: J.1

DATE: 26.12.1992, 1989, 7435, 1123, 2006, 1001, 2006, 14, discussed.5, 1995, 1998, 25.8.1970, 1)(a, 1939, 1988, 2004, 1939, 1939, 1923, 1939, 1939, 1923, 1923, 1123, 2006, 1001, 2006, 14

ORG: GBQ, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, this High Court, Learned Counsel, Rajasthan High Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., National Insurance Co. Ltd., the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, The Hon'ble Apex Court, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., CM, The Apex Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, under:(12, Delhi High Court, the Claims Tribunal, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, SC, Court, SC, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, The Hon'ble Apex Court, Fiat, the High Court, Letters Patent Appeals, the Division Bench, the High Court, Court, the High Court, unambiguous.6, National Insurance Co. Ltd., the Hon'ble Apex Court, Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., SC, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., CM, National Insurance Co. Ltd., the Apex Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., the Apex Court, SC, the Workmen's Compensation Act.(21, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sections, Learned Counsel, Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., National Insurance Co. Ltd., the Apex Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., New India Assurance Co. Ltd., CM, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Hon'ble Apex Court, this High Court, the Supreme Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

CARDINAL: 3,94,000, 2,15,000, 1,50,000, only one, 240, 1,50,000, 2, 2, 1, 240, 2002]1SCR298, two, 50,000, 4, 1 to 3, 1,03,360, 3,60,000, two, 1 to 3.It, 50,000, one, 50,000, one, 50,000.It, 50,000, 470, 531, 50,000, 1998]2SCR284, 2, 1, 2, 5 One, 1,25,000, 15,800, 5, 20,800, Two, 56,000, 6, 8, 270, 2002]1SCR298, 1995]1SCR871, 240, 2, 648, 1939.A, one, 95, 1939.9, 1,50,000, 1939.10, 2, 2, 1, 2002]1SCR298, 1,50,000, 1,50,000

MONEY: 12 per cent, 15 per cent

ORDINAL: third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third

WORK_OF_ART: Hastimal Locha MACD 2006, Hastimal Locha MACD 2006

GPE: thus:(7, Shanti Bai's, Keshav Bahadur's, India, India, Tribunal.12

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, Section II, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act