Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mohan Lal Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Decided On : Sep-10-2008

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 54, the JDA Act', Section 54, the JDA Act and Rules 15, Section 54, the JDA Act, Rule 15, Rule 15-B, Section 90, Section 54, the JDA Act, Article 14 of the Constitution.11, Article 166 of the Constitution, a Constitutional Bench, Section 90, Regulation 13 of the Regulations, Article 166 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, the JDA Act

PERSON: Narayan Roy, G.S. Bapna, Bapna, Bapna, Bapna, Guru Nank Tubewell Pvt, Cyan Vihar', Ram, Shyam, Haryana, Mahesh Chand, Bharat Vyas, Alok Sharma, Bharat Vyas, Alok Sharma, Anr, Anr, Mohan Lal Sharma v., Chand Bhandari, Mohan Lal Sharma v., S.P. Gururaja, Bapna

ORG: the State Government, the State Government, the Board of infrastructure Development and Investment Promotion, BIDI, the Jaipur Development Authority Act, the Rajasthan Improvement Trust, the Jaipur Development Authority, JDA, the State Government, Learned Counsel, State, JDA, Court, the Apex Court, Learned Counsel, State, State, JDA, Slate, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, State, WLC, Additional Advocate General, State, JDA, PIL, State, JDA, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, the State of Rajasthan, State, the State Government, the Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme, Learned Counsel, the State of Rajasthan, Learned Counsel, BIDI, JDA, State, State, JDA, Learned Counsel, State, JDA, the State Government, Convention Centre, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, BIDI, Committee, BIDI, the Apex Court, M.P. Oil Extraction, Court, Ajay Chhabra v. State of, Rajasthan (D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL, Union of India, Bhandari, WLC, the Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, M.P. Oil Extraction v. State of, the Apex Court, State, Court, Ajay Chhabra, State, the State Government, the State Government, Rajasthan Information Technology Policy, State, The High Powered Committee, BIDI, State, The State of Rajasthan, Court, State, Court, PIL, Union of India, M/s. Mahindra World City, Mahendra & Mahendra Ltd., JDA, BIDI, the State Government, JDA, SEZ, BIDI, Division Bench, SEZ, Steering Committee, BIDI, the State Government, State, State, Government, State, Chairman & M.D. BPL Ltd., the Apex Court, Company, the State Government, The High-Level Committee, State, BIDI, State, State, State, BIDI, BIDI, BIDI, PIL

QUANTITY: 47073 Square Metres

FAC: Ashram Road, Convention Centre

CARDINAL: 375, 3, 117, 250, 15, 3, 3, 3.4, 3, 15, 3apna, 3, 117, 375, 814/1994, 346, 1992]1SCR616, 15, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 1980]3SCR1338, 1997)7SCC592, 3, 420, 2008(1, 885.14, 3, 1, 16, two, 4, 1600, 21, 3, 3

DATE: 1982, 1974, 1974, 1974, 1974, 1974, 2003, 7672/2003, 2007, 2000, 2207/2007, 1974, Para 18, the present day, 1974

GPE: question.3, Counsel, Counsel, India, Jammu, Poonam, Jammu, Jammu, Poonam, Jaipur, Counsel

LOC: Kashmir, Kashmir, Kashmir

ORDINAL: first

EVENT: Regulation 7

PRODUCT: considerations.23

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //