Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Cit Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission
Decided On : Nov-02-2001
Court : Rajasthan
LAW: section 44BB(2, the Income Tax Act, section 28(iv, the Income Tax Act, section 263, section 263, section 44BB(1, Central Act, section 5, Section 14 of the Act, Chapter IV, Section 28, Section 29, section 28, section 37, Section 38, Section 43, section 44BB, section 42, Chapter IV, section 42, section 115A, a Constitution Bench, Article 372'The, Article 278, Constitution, Constitution, Article 278, Article 372, Article 278, Article 278, Article 372.'The, section 28, section 28(iv, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 44BB(2, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, the Income Tax Act, section 28, section 44B(1, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act
PERSON: Rajesh Balia, 43A, 43A, Board of, Subba Rao, J., G.M. Kokil, Rao v., Ashalata S. Guram, Kalliani Amma v. K. Deo, 43A, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur
NORP: J.All, Indian, Indian, Indian
ORG: Oil and Natural Gas Commission, M/s Compagnie Generals Deo Gophysique, CGG, D.B., Tribunal, Tribunal, 68/2001, Tribunal, the Honble Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, CGG, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Union of India, the Apex Court, SM, Board of Revenue, computed.10, Orissa High Court, Oil India Ltd., Bench, Hon'ble G.B. Patnaik & P.C. Naik, Parliament, 68/2001, Tribunal, Tribunal, ONGC, CGG, Tribunal, Tribunal
GPE: France, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, S.I. Corpn, S.I. Corpn, Chandavarkar, Trivandrum
CARDINAL: 30-3-2000, 2, 2, 71/2001, 32, 37, 28, 41, 43, 2, 11, 28, 41, 43, 1964]4SCR280, two, 196, 4, 2, 2, 28, 41, 43, 2, 13, 212, 225, 1, 71/2001, 48/99, 49/99, 50/99, 51/99, 52/99 53/99, 54/99, 55/9915, 26
ORDINAL: first
DATE: 1961, '10, 1961, '1, the previous year, 1984, 1986, 43, 1995, 1961, later assessment years
PRODUCT: Commissioner?2, 44BB, C1
MONEY: only 10 per cent, ten per cent, 10 per cent, 10 per cent, ten per cent, 256(1, only 10 per cent, 256(1
TIME: some particular Act
LOC: South India Corpn