Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs Vs. R. Unnikrishan
Decided On : Nov-02-2007
Court : Rajasthan
LAW: Section 40, Section 48 of the B.S.F. Act, Rule 24, Rule 24, the Army Act, Section 71, the Army Act, Section 71, Section 48 of the B.S.F. Act, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Pension Regulations of Army, Section 71, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Navy Act, Section 71, Section 81, the Navy Act, Section 81(m, Regulation 15, Article 309, the Pension Regulations
PERSON: Rajesh Balia, Anr, Harbans Singh Sandhu's, Court Martial, Regulations, Court Martial, Harbans Singh Sandhu's
NORP: J.1, Harbans
GPE: Single, T.S., Singh, Counsel, T.S., India, Lt, T.S.
DATE: 14th February, 1997, 27.8.1974, the year 1984.4, 14.12.1994, 2002, 3 months, 1972, 1972, his past service.11, 1961, 1964
ORG: Constable, the Border Security Force, Constable Nursing, the Border Security Force Act, Summery Security Force Court, Security Force Court, the Supreme Court, Major G.S. Sodhi v. Union of India, Union of India, the Central Civil Service Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, the Apex Court, Union of India, P.D. Yadav, Army Act, Pension Regulations, Army, Navy, Navy Pension Rules, Major G.S. Sodhi's, above.14, Court, Navy, Court, Army Pension Regulation, Navy Pension Regulation, the Central Government, the High Court, Court, the Central Government under Regulation, the Navy Pension Regulations, Navy, Navy, the Central Government, the Central Government, Central Government, Court, the Supreme Court, P.D. Yadav, State
CARDINAL: two, 16, 427.8, two, one, 2002)1SCC405, 16(a, 16(a, 2
LOC: Single Judge
PERCENT: 12%
EVENT: Regulation 15
FAC: Sodi