Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs Vs. R. Unnikrishan

Decided On : Nov-02-2007

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 40, Section 48 of the B.S.F. Act, Rule 24, Rule 24, the Army Act, Section 71, the Army Act, Section 71, Section 48 of the B.S.F. Act, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Pension Regulations of Army, Section 71, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Navy Act, Section 71, Section 81, the Navy Act, Section 81(m, Regulation 15, Article 309, the Pension Regulations

PERSON: Rajesh Balia, Anr, Harbans Singh Sandhu's, Court Martial, Regulations, Court Martial, Harbans Singh Sandhu's

NORP: J.1, Harbans

GPE: Single, T.S., Singh, Counsel, T.S., India, Lt, T.S.

DATE: 14th February, 1997, 27.8.1974, the year 1984.4, 14.12.1994, 2002, 3 months, 1972, 1972, his past service.11, 1961, 1964

ORG: Constable, the Border Security Force, Constable Nursing, the Border Security Force Act, Summery Security Force Court, Security Force Court, the Supreme Court, Major G.S. Sodhi v. Union of India, Union of India, the Central Civil Service Pension Rules, the Pension Rules, the Apex Court, Union of India, P.D. Yadav, Army Act, Pension Regulations, Army, Navy, Navy Pension Rules, Major G.S. Sodhi's, above.14, Court, Navy, Court, Army Pension Regulation, Navy Pension Regulation, the Central Government, the High Court, Court, the Central Government under Regulation, the Navy Pension Regulations, Navy, Navy, the Central Government, the Central Government, Central Government, Court, the Supreme Court, P.D. Yadav, State

CARDINAL: two, 16, 427.8, two, one, 2002)1SCC405, 16(a, 16(a, 2

LOC: Single Judge

PERCENT: 12%

EVENT: Regulation 15

FAC: Sodi

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //