Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ladu Ram Jat Vs. C.J. (S.D.) C.J.M. and ors.

Decided On : May-17-2002

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: the Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Jatwada, Section 19(1)(iv, the Panchayat Act, Section 19, the Panchayat Act, Section 19(1)(iv, Section 19, Section 19(1)(iv, Section 19, Section 19(1)(iv, the Adoption Act, Section 19, Section 19 of the Act, Section 19(1)(iv, Section 19(0, Section 19(1, Section 19(i, Section 19, Section 19(1, Section 19(1)(iv, Section 19(1)(iv).35, the Section 19(1)(iv, Section 19(1)(iv, Section 19(1)(iv

GPE: Rathore, Rajaslhan, Clause, Rajas, UC, Sarpanch, Panch, India, Panch, sister.36

DATE: J. 1, 11th January, 2000, 11th January, 2000, 31 st January, 2000, 25.5.1999, 1995, 27.11.1995, 27.11.1995, 27.11.1995, 17.3.2001, 25.5.1999, 25.4.1994, 25.5.1999, 1994, 1994, 2nd February, 2002, the same day i.e., February, 2002, 2nd February, 2002, 2nd February, 2002, the same day, February, the next date, 13.4.2002, 2nd February, 2002, 14th March, 2002, 14.3.2002.14, 1994, 27th November, 1995, 27th November 1995, 1994, 1994, 1796, 1998, 1999, 350.(5, 1994, 1995, 2 years old, 27.11.1995, 27.11.1995, 2 7th, November, 1995, 27th November, 1995, 27th November, 1995, 27.11.1995, 30th January, 2000, 1994, 27.11.1995, 27.11.1995

PERSON: Gram Panchayat, Jatwara Panchayat Circle, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Jatwada, Shri Ladu Ram, Jaipur District, Jaipur, Pinku, Dipu @ Poonam, Seema, Karma, Anita, Seema, Karma, Pinku, Tinku, Dipur, Shri Radheyshyam S, Radheyshyam, Radheyshyam, Radhey Shyam, Radheyshyam, Ladu Ram v. State, Panchayati Raj Act, Rajendra Soni, G. Bardhar, Jaipur District, Jaipur District.21, Pinku, Pinku, G. Bardhar, Shri Radheyshyam, Bardhar, Radheyshyam, Bardhar, Instant, Rajendra, Rashan Card, Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, Ajmer v. State

WORK_OF_ART: Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat Jatwada, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Jatwara, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Jalwada, Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, Mukesh Kumar Ajmera v. State of, Sarpanch, Mukesh Kumar Ajmera v. State of, Mukesh Kumar, Mukesh Kumar Ajmera v. State of

CARDINAL: 31.1.2000, 2, 7.6.1996, 2, more than two, one, four, one, 1994.6, two, three, only two, two, two, 4, 2, one, 7.6.1996, 16.1.2002, only one, only two, one, 2002.11, 13.2.2002.12, 13.2.2002, 1, 28.2.2002.13, 2, more than two, 14.3.2002, 1994.15, 19, 1, more than two, 1, more than two, only one, 16, one, 3, 2, 136, 3, 472, 4, 2, 14.3.2002, 2, four, one, 25.5.1999, more than two, two, one, 27.11.1995, one, more than two, 6.1,2000, 2, 4, 6.1.2000, more than two, only one, one, two, two, 6, 39, more than two, 26, 39, more than two, four, five, only two, 1, 13.3.2002.39

ORG: the District & Sessions, Dipu, Election Tribunal, DW-1, the Election Tribunal, the Election Tribunal, the Election Tribunal, the Election Tribunal, The Election Tribunal, the Election Tribunal, Court, the High Court, Election Tribunal, the Gram Panchayat Jatwada, the Election Tribunal, the Election Tribunal, petitioner.18, Hindu Adoption, the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, Election Tribunal, AIR 1988 SC, WLC, the Election Officer, the District & Sessions, the Civil Judge (SD, the Rashan Card as Ex, Court, Election Tribunal, Rajasthan Government Gazette Extra Ordinary Part, State, Directive Principles, State, this High Court, Court, State Legislature, today.33, Panchayat Raj Institution, State, State, the Division Bench, Court, Hindu Adoption, the Division Bench, Court, the Election Tribunal

FAC: the Rashan Card

LOC: hereinabove.30

PRODUCT: Articles 14 or 21 of Constitution, Articles 25

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //