Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Birbal and anr.
Decided On : Feb-13-2007
Court : Rajasthan
LAW: Section 10
GPE: R.S., India, Poonam, Poonam
ORG: Oriental Insurance Company, the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, The Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, The Insurance Company, Court, New India Assurance Co., Ors, Court, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Jhonsa and Ors, Bar, Court, Court, the Insurance Company, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Khalsi, Khalsi, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Khalsi, dismissed.8, the Insurance Company, United Insurance Co. Ltd., Jhonsa and Ors, the Insurance Company, Court, the Insurance Company
WORK_OF_ART: 30.9.2002
PERSON: Sikar, Bhanwar Lal, RJ-23-R-4079, Bhanwar Lal, Prem Sukh, Hardev Ram, Vigyan Shah, Bhanwar Lal, Rama Singh v., Singh v. Kamla, Rama Singh, Khalsi, Singh, Bhanwar Lal
PRODUCT: Birbal, 398
DATE: 2,500/- per month, 50/- per day, 1923, 2,500/- per month, 1996
CARDINAL: 1, one, one, 30.9.2002, 1, two, 2001(6)KarLJ379, 30.9.2002, 1, 1
EVENT: the Workmen Compensation Act
ORDINAL: Secondly, Thirdly, Secondly, Thirdly