Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Birbal and anr.

Decided On : Feb-13-2007

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 10

GPE: R.S., India, Poonam, Poonam

ORG: Oriental Insurance Company, the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, The Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, The Insurance Company, Court, New India Assurance Co., Ors, Court, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Jhonsa and Ors, Bar, Court, Court, the Insurance Company, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Khalsi, Khalsi, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Khalsi, dismissed.8, the Insurance Company, United Insurance Co. Ltd., Jhonsa and Ors, the Insurance Company, Court, the Insurance Company

WORK_OF_ART: 30.9.2002

PERSON: Sikar, Bhanwar Lal, RJ-23-R-4079, Bhanwar Lal, Prem Sukh, Hardev Ram, Vigyan Shah, Bhanwar Lal, Rama Singh v., Singh v. Kamla, Rama Singh, Khalsi, Singh, Bhanwar Lal

PRODUCT: Birbal, 398

DATE: 2,500/- per month, 50/- per day, 1923, 2,500/- per month, 1996

CARDINAL: 1, one, one, 30.9.2002, 1, two, 2001(6)KarLJ379, 30.9.2002, 1, 1

EVENT: the Workmen Compensation Act

ORDINAL: Secondly, Thirdly, Secondly, Thirdly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //