Cpl Debasish Sen Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Sep-28-2005

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Article 14 and 21, Article 14, Article 21 - protection, Article 21, Article 33, Article 33(a, Article 33, Article 33, Constitution, Article 33, Constitution, the Air force Act, Article 33, Article 21, Chapter III, Article 33, Article 33, Article 33, Article 33, the Army Act, Article 33, Constitution, Article 33, Article 19, Article 33 of the Constitution of India, Article 226

ORG: R.P. Vyas, the Indian Air Force, IAF, Signal Unit, Air Force Unit, Annex, Signal Unit of, Air Force, Red Ink, Annex, Rule 15(2)(g)(ii, the Air Force Rules, Annex, Rule 15(2)(g)(ii, the Air Force Rules, Annex, Rule 15(2)(g)(ii, the Air Force Rules, Red Ink, Annex, Annex, Red Ink, Red Ink, Rule 15(2)(g)(ii, the Air Force Rules, Authorities, Annex, Annex, Authorities, the Air Force Authorities, Red Ink, Red Ink, IAF, Rule 15(2)(g)(ii, the Air Force Rules, Red Ink, Red Ink, Red Ink, Authorities, Rule 15(2)(g)(ii, the Air Force, Rule 15(2)(g)(ii, the Air Force Rules, the Air Force Personnel, the Air Force Law, Red Ink, Authority, Authority, Administrative, Air Force Rules and Regulations, Authority, Air Force, the Air Force, Air Force, Air Force, the Air Force, National, Parliament, the Armed Forces, Union of India, Ors, the Supreme Court, Army, the Armed Forces, Armed Force, Parliament, Union of India, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Singh Vedi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Parliament, Army, Delhi Police Non-Gazetted Karmchari Sangh and Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, Parliament, the Armed Forces, Government, The Indian Air Force, the Air Force, the Air Force Personnel, State, Nation, the Appropriate Authorities, the Competent Authorities, the Air Force Rules, the Competent Authorities, Red Ink, Rule 15(2)(g)(ii, the Air Force Rules, Court, Court, the Competent Authorities, the Competent Authorities, the Air Force Rules

DATE: 16.2.1993, the year, 2003, August, 2002, 2.5.2003, 2.5.2003, 1969, 1969, 1969.3, 1.7.2003, 23.7.2003, 1969, August, 2003, 31.12.2003, the end of the year 2003, July, 2004, 1.9.2004, 1969, 13.9.2004, 1.11.2004, 20 years, 15.2.2003, 23.7.2003, 1969, 23.7.2003, 31.10.2003, 1983CriLJ647, 1987)ILLJ121SC, 1969

CARDINAL: 33, 3, 5.5.2003, 1, 33, No.4, three, No.4, 1, 1, Four, Four, No.4, 2, 4, 4, 2, two, 5, No.2, 3, 16.8.2002, 4, two, one, 6, 7, one, 16.8.2002, 15(2, No.4, 8), one, two, one, 8, 12, 28.1.2005, 9, 4, four, 1969.7, six, four, six, one, 5.5.2003, 5.5.2003, 2002(81)ECC236, 2003]3SCR1092

GPE: Jodhpur, Counsel, Counsel, India, G.S., India

PERSON: Habitual Offender, Habitual Offender, K.K. Shah, Counsel, Habitual Offender, Habitual Offender, Habitual Offender, L.D. Balam Singh, v. Ex, Armed, Offender Policy

PRODUCT: Para 2(b

ORDINAL: second, first, second

TIME: 48 hours

NORP: Indian

WORK_OF_ART: Rules and Regulations