Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jagmal Singh Yadav and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Decided On : Mar-20-2009

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: the Explosive Substances Act, the Explosive Substances Act, Section 4/5, Explosive Substances Act, Section 4/5, the Explosive Substances Act, Section 4/5, the Explosive Substance Act, the Explosive Act and Rules, the Explosive Substances Act, the Explosive Substances Act, the Explosive Substances Act, Section 32, the Evidence Act

PERSON: Mahesh Chandra Sharma, Jagmal Singh Yadav, Ram Balak Patel, E-10019, Haryana, Tehsil Kaman, Blasting, Bharatpur, Jagmal Singh, Raj Kumar Goyal, Tehsil Kaman Distt, Counsel, Blasting, Blasting, Anr, Rajasthan S.B., judged.(vi, Wati

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2, 22, 1, 1

DATE: Feb. 6, 2009, 1908, 1983, day, January 15, 2004, 2004, 1908, Feb. 6, 2009, 1908, Feb. 6, 2009, 1983, day, 1983, day, 1282, 2003, January 22, 2009, Feb. 6, 2009, a period of 3 months

ORG: Additional Sessions, Kaman, the Explosive Rules, Court, Learned Counsel, the Exposive Substances Act, Counsel, Public Prosecutors, State, the Explosive Rules, the Explosive Rules, Magistrate, The High Courts, The Supreme Court, the High Court, The Apex Court, AIR 2001, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the High Courts

LOC: Northern Region

GPE: Faridabad, Luhesar, District Bharatpur, Sunrise, Sunset, Sunset, Luhesar, Luhesar, Sunrise, Sunset, Sunset, Sunrise, Sunset, Sunset

WORK_OF_ART: an Explosive Van, an Explosive Van, an Explosive Van

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //