Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr. Girish Agarwal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Decided On : Aug-19-2008

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 7, Rule 13, Rule 22, Rule 13, Section 7, 13(1, Rule 13, Rule 22, Rule 13, Rule 13, Rule 13, the Rule of 1958, Rule 13, Section 5(1)(d)(2, Rule 13, Section 13(1)(d, Rule 13 of the Rule 1958, Rule 22

PERSON: Raghuvendra S. Rathore, J.1, Shakir Mohammed, Ali Mohammed, Shakir Mohammed, Shri Abdul Khalil Ansari, Kota, Abdul Khalil Ansari, Abdul Hakim, Kota, Outpost Kota, Kota, Abdul Khalil Ansari, Shri Abdul Hakim, Kota, Shri Abdul Hakim, Abdul khalil Ansari, Kota, Kota, Abdul Hakim, Shri Abdul Khalil Ansari, Shri Abdul Hakim, Abdul Hakim, Abdul Hakim, Abdul Hakim, Shri Vallabh Sharma, Rajasthan, Lajpat Rai Gogna v. State, Prem Prakash Mathur v. State, Jai Prakash Soni v. State, Anr, S.B. Civil Writ Petition, Counsel, Abdul Hakim, B.K. Sharma v. State, Ashok Gaur, Nand Lal Verma v. State, B.M. Bohara, Shri Vallabh Sharma, Rajasthan, Karmik, Departments.(2, Karmik, Shaukat Ali v. State, Rajasthan 855, Lajpat Rai Gogna v. State, Kotwali, Dholpur, Jaipur, Jai Prakash Soni v. State, Anr, Abdul Khalil Ansari, Abdul Hakim, Girish Agarwal, Shri Abdul Hakim, Abdul Khalil Ansari

ORG: Department of Personnel, Government of Rajasthan, the Registered Medical Practitioners, the State Government, the Registered Medical Practitioners, the State Government, Karwad, Medical Practitioners, Anti Corruption Bureau, the State of Government, him.6, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Anti Corruption Bureau, Anti Corruption Bureau, the Rajasthan Civil Services, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Rajasthan Civil Service, Discipline and Appeal, Ansaroosifa, Bureau Anti Corruption, Hiranmagri Market, CMHO, Bureau of Anti Corruption, Learned Counsel, the Rajasthan Civil Service, Counsel, Learned Counsel, WLC, RLR, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the CCA Rules, the State Government, Learned Counsel, the State Government, the State Government, Court, Court, The Appointing Authority, Government, the Appointing Authority, the Appointing Authority, the Appointing Authority, Government, Government, the Appointing Authority, the High Court, State, Court, Government, The Appointing Authority, Government, RLR, Government, Government, vinoulam juris', The Hon'ble Supreme Court, P.L. Shah v. Union of India, Kuldeep Singh Dhillon v. State, Rajasthan S.B. Civil Writ Petition No, Court, Rajasthan S.B. Civil Writ Petition No, Court, WLC, the High Court, Government, the State Government, Court, the Disciplinary Authority, Enquiry Officer.(5) Completion of Departmental Enquiry, the Show Cause, Notice, the Rajasthan Civil Services, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Administrative Departments/Head of Departments, the Department of Personnel, Administrative Department/Head of Department, the Administrative Departments/Head, the Department of Personnel, the Administrative Departments Head, Departments, the Head of the Department, the Enquiry Officer, Departmental Enquiries, Administrative, Departmental Enquiries, Court, the CCA Rules, Court, Government, RLR, the Executive Engineer, Irrigation, Dholpur, SHO, Anti Corruption Department, the Anti Corruption Department, ACD, the Anti Corruption Department, Government, Court, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, Government, Bank, Government, Government, Government, Prem Prakash Mathur v. State of, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947, Government, Government, the Rajasthan Civil Services, Control and Appeal, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, Department, Court

DATE: the month of March 2003, 11/03/2003, daily, 13/04/2003.5, 21/07/2005, 19/04/2003.8, 13/04/2003, 23/05/2003, 13/12/2005.9, 23/03/2003, 21/07/2005, 19/04/2003, 23/05/2003, the month of August, 2008, 23/05/2003, 1991, 1992, 2005, 3962, 17/12/2007, setaside.10, 1988, the same day, 10/08/2001, 1979, 1989, 13/12/1990, 6558/1991, 18/02/1991, 1991, 17th March, 1960, 3 months, 1 month, the Minim.2 months, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 Week, 1958, three months, three months, 1958, WLR 1992, years, 1992, 1958, 27/03/1987, a period of, 4 years, 1958, four years, 8 months, over 56 months, 3962, 467, 10.08.2001, 10.08.2001, 1958, 17/12/2007, the month of February 2005, 13.06.2007, 20.10.2007, 31.12.2007, the end of this month, seven days, 23/05/2003, the last 5 years, 3 months, 13/04/2003, 1958, 21/07/2005, 23/05/2003, one week

GPE: District of Kota, Rajasthan, case.12, orders.(5, Rajasthan 1987(5, Jaipur, Rules, Rajasthan, Jodhpur, suspension.26

CARDINAL: two, two, one, 99/03, 1958.7, 23.05.2005, one, 25,000/-, 25, 25,000/-, 25,000/-, 22, 1, 508, 1, 619, 9, 6492/06, 99/03, 2)(7)(ii, 13, 29, 515, 547, 1, 601, 1967CriLJ1390, 3174/88, 1, 508, 13, 2, 2, 16.10.1975.The, 13, 22.5.74, 21.8.74, 1, 619, 420, 468, 471, 6492/06, 13(2, one, 25,000/-

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first

WORK_OF_ART: Discipline and Appeal

TIME: forty-eight hours

MONEY: 89)A-AIII/72

PRODUCT: Mahadeo Prasad Gupta

PERCENT: 120B I.P.C.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //