Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Braj Bhushan Singh and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Decided On : Aug-12-2016
Court : Jharkhand
LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.5
CARDINAL: 1, 12, 2, 3, 4, 2, about 100 to 150, four, one, 397, 17, 31.08.2003, 3 3, 25.06.2011, 4, 9, 4, about 8.40, 3, 9, 6
DATE: 2006 1, 4, August, 2015, 06.06.2001, 06.07.1979, 27.02.1989, 11.07.1985, 01.12.1988, some days, 07.06.2001, under Section 395, 08.10.2005, about 16-17 years, one year, about 15- 17 years, one year, 2013, more than 15 years, a period of, eight weeks, this order.7
PERSON: Braj Bhushan Singh, Nandan Chaudhary, P.O. Nawagaxly, P.S. Muffasil, Nagendra Singh, Chandrfa Singh, Deo Narayan Sharma, Village- Tikri Baswaria, Thar Wai, Petitioners Versus 1, Ranchi.5, Jamshedpur, Saurabh Shekhar, Chanchal Jain, J.:1, Saurabh Shekhar, Shiv Lakhan Pandey, Chanchal Jain, Head Constable, Pramath Patnaik, J.
GPE: Singh, Harmuri, Charan, P.O. Basudeopur, P.S. Kalyanpur, P.O. Kamlanagar, P.S., Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, J.C., A.A.G., no.4, Barkakana, Ranchi, Ranchi, J.C., Barkakana
ORG: P.O. Sorangapal, P.S. Ganrichok, Patna.2, Shri Umesh Chaudhary, Shri Ram, Village – Akbarpur, District-Allahabad, U.P., The State of Jharkhand 2, Home, Government of Jharkhand, inter alia, no.5, Tata, Railway, S.P., Railway, no.5, Court, A.A.G., State, State, Court, no.5, State, Court, Tata, Shiv Lakhan Pandey, Apex Court, Madhya Pradesh and Others
FAC: Harubera Station, Rail P.S. Muri, Harubera Station
TIME: night, night, the fateful night i.e.
PRODUCT: no.1
WORK_OF_ART: The Superintendent of Police, Rajendra Yadav Vs
ORDINAL: second, second, second