Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Brijendra Singh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Decided On : Dec-18-1997

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 394 IPC, Section 344 Cr, Rule 13, Constitution, Rule 13, Rule 13, the Essential Commodities Act

ORG: N.L. Tibrewal, the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, RPSC, Additional Director, Agriculture Marketing, Agriculture Marketing, Shri Pooran Chand, Agriculture Marketing, the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division, Court, the Collector & District Magistrate, the Rajasthan Subordinate Service (Recruitment, Service Conditions) Rules, Agrl./Gr, S.O. 163, the State Government, Direct Recruitment, the Superintendent After Care Home, Care Home, the Inspector General of Prisons, Legislature, State, Sheesh Ram v. State of, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No, the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, Court, RLR, Rajasthan (Civil Appeal No., the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Agriculture Marketing

NORP: J.1, Rules

CARDINAL: two, 16, 7.11.1996, 7(26)/RE/94, five, One, 23.9.1996, 7.11.1996, five, 10.12.1996, two, 394, 392, 2, two, 2/81, 13, two, two, 1, 2, two, 16, 13, 2

PERSON: Articles 14, Jai Ram, sound?5, Sawaimadhopur, Articles 14, Gopi Lal v. State, Anr, Matadin Garg, Matadin Garg

DATE: 15, June 7, 1997, October 28, 1996, 1960, January 9, 1986, more than six months, 15, April 1, 1997, 1989, 1989, 2719/91, four weeks, today

GPE: Pooran Chand, Hindaun City, P.C., Prisons, Rajasthan, Jaipur

ORDINAL: second

PERCENT: 50%, 50%

LOC: Superintendent, information.10

PRODUCT: 748.9

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //