Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex Sepoy Chander Singh

Decided On : Nov-19-1997

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 18, Rule 34, Rule 115, Rule 34, Rule 34, Rule 34, Rule 34, Rule 34, Rule 34, Article 311 of the Constitution, Rule 36, Rule 34, Rule 34, the Army Act, Article 14 of the Constitution.18, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, The Constitution Bench, Rule 34, Article 14 of the Constitution

PERSON: B.S. Chauhan, Sepoy, Naib Subedar, P.P. Chaudhary, S.K., P.P. Chaudhary, Sita Devi v. State of, Anr, Uma Shanker Pathak v. Union, Dutt Datta v. Union, Babaji Kondaji Garad Nasik Merchants Cooperative Bank Ltd., Chaudhary, B. Karunkar, S.K. Sharma, S.K. Singh v., Uma Shanker Pathak's, Singh Bedi v. Union, Ceaser, Ceaser, Chaudhary, Naib Subedar, Nanda, Bhagat Ram v. State, S.K. Giri v. Home, Supp, Siriraj Sharma, Supp, Bishan Singh, Thakur, B.C. Chaturvedi v., Anr, Madras, Rai Bareilly Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Bhola Nath Singh, B.C. Chaturvedi, Giriraj Sharma, S.K. Sharma, Manorma Verma v. State of, Ramesh Chandra and, Daya Ram, K.K. Pavitheran, Suppl, Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab, Akhlaq Ahmad, B. Karunakar, Bihari Shastri

NORP: J.1, Statute, Rules, R.

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single

DATE: 28.5.1997, 17.8.1990, 17.9.1990, six months', 28.5.1997, 1956, 1995, 1995)1SCC133, 1965]1SCR970, 1989, 405, 1996)IILLJ296SC, thirty four days, 1983CriLJ647, six months, 1995, 1994, 2000)IILLJ648SC, 1996)IILLJ296SC, 1994, 1994, 1995, 1993, a period of, three months, today

ORG: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No, the Indian Army, the Union of India, the Army Rules, Babua Ram and Ors, U.P., Ors, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Legislature, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, directory.10, Raza Buland Sugar Company Limited v. Municipal Board, the Supreme Court, the Allahabad High Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Ors, Union of India v. Amrit, Authorities, Vide Managing, E.C.I.L., State Bank of Patiala, Major G.S. Sodhi v. Union of India, Central Bank of India, Army, under:115, Army, the Army Rules, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Army Act, Army, the Supreme Court, Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, the Armed Forces, defiance, Quantum, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, U.P., Ministry of Home Affairs, UOI, UOI, Ors, UOI, UOI, State Bank of India v. Samerandra Kishore Endow, State, State, UP, State, AIR 1996, Transport, Thiru ARK Moorthy, State of Punjab, the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Apex Court, Union of India v. Ganayuthem, the Supreme Court, Authority, Authority, State Bank of Patiala, the Apex Court, State, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Punjab National Bank Ltd., P.N.B. Employees Federation, Hindustan Tin Works Pvt, Hindustan Tin Works Pvt, Santosh Yadav, Haryana and Ors, Delhi Administration, Vide Sub Divisional Inspector, Ors, C.B., State, U.P., Ors, Court

CARDINAL: 358/1991, ten thousand, 15.8.1990, two, 1, 2, 34, less than, less than twenty-four, 1, 2, only one, 1, 670, 3, 36, 1969CriLJ663, 1984]1SCR767, 4, 1, 1994)ILLJ162SC, 1991CriLJ1947, 1997)ILLJ537SC, 2, 2, 2, 1, 115, 2, 1983)IILLJ1SC, 3, 519, 3, 755, 1988CriLJ158, 1994)ILLJ872SC, 1996)IILLJ386SC, 1995)1SCC332, 1999)ILLJ947SC, 1959)IILLJ666SC, 1978)IILLJ474SC, 671, 1996)10SCC409, 1996)11SCC695, 1, 573, 1996)IILLJ432SC, 2, one

WORK_OF_ART: 'the Rules

TIME: ninety-six hours, less than 96 hours, ninety six hours

PRODUCT: Rule 115, Rule 115, Rule 115

GPE: India, R.I.