Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Yashoda Kumari and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and ors.

Decided On : Aug-08-1984

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 110D of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 92-A, Chapter VII-A, Section 92-A

PERSON: S.N. Bhargava, Jaipur-Ajmer, Pritam Singh, Dheer Singh, Pritam Singh, Pritam Singh.6, Counsel, Srivastava, Counsel, Mohan Singh

QUANTITY: 9-2-1972, 61/2 miles, 9-2-1972

ORG: the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, the Life Insurance Corporation of India, Learned Tribunal, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act, Learned Counsel, Karnatak Co., Venktaiva, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Ramkishan

GPE: Jaipur, Jaipur, Singh, Buckingham, rejected.10, Tribunal.12

CARDINAL: 26, 696 3, 3487, Three, 3487, 3487, two, only one, 1

DATE: 3487, 6963, 1982, the year 1982, the year 1968, 1972, 3407, 3487, PW 3, Jamindar

MONEY: 1963)IILLJ638SC .8

TIME: 1 am

EVENT: PW 4

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //