Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Smt. Sujata Bhardwaj and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Decided On : Nov-26-1996

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Article 22(5, Article 22(5, the National Security Act, the N.D.P.S. Act, the National Security Act, Article 21 of the Constitution of India.9, Article 22(5, Article 22(5, Section 3 of the Act, Article 22(5, Article 22(5, Article 22(5, Article 22 Clause, the National Security Act, Article 22(5

PERSON: B.R. Arora, Sujata Bhardwaj, Rakesh Kumar Bhardwaj, Ashwani, Kumar Bhardwaj, Jailor, Chittorgarh, Chittorgarh, Chittorgarh, Sujata Bhardwaj, Jailor, Chittorgarh, Kumar Bhardwaj, Kumar Bhardwaj, Chittorgarh, Krishna Murari Aggarwala v., Shalini Soni, Chandra Ganguli, Atma Ram, Kumar Bhardwaj, Nisar, Nisar Ahmed, Chittorgarh, Kumar Bhardwaj

NORP: J.1, Ashwani, Ashwani, Ashwani

CARDINAL: two, 2, 31.8.96, 14.9.96, six, 26.9.96, 27.9.96, 30.9.96, 31.8.96, 31.8.96, 31.8.96, 31.8.96, three, one, 2, 31.8.96, 31.8.96, 1975CriLJ1648, 489, 1980CriLJ1487, 7, two, 1, 2, 1959CriLJ1501, two, 5, 408/96, 3, 2.6.96, 31.8.96, 31.8.96, 31.9.96, 31.8.96, 2.9.96, 255, 31.8.96

ORG: Habeas Corpus Petitions, 31.8.96, the District Magistrate, Chittorgarh, the National Security Act, The District Magistrate, Chittorgarh, Chittorgarh, Ashwani Kumar Bhardwaj, the National Security Act, the Sub-Jail, the Sub Jail, Shri Dalip Sarkar - the, Smt, the State Government, the Central Government, Smt, the State Government, the District Magistrate, Chittorgarh, the Detaining Authority, The Detaining Authority, the State Government, the Central Government, Advisory, the Detaining Authority, the State Government, the State Government, the Detaining Authority, the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board, The Advisory Board, The State Government, the Advisory Board, 31.8.96, the Detaining Authority, the Advisory Board, the Central Government, the Detaining Authority, the Habeas Corpus Petitions, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Narcotic Drugs and, the Detaining Authority, the Advisory Board, Police Officers, the Advisory Board, the Central Government, the Advisory Board, the State Government, the Advisory Board, Additional Advocate General, the District Magistrate, Chittorgarh, the Central Government, the State Government, the Advisory Board, the Central Government, the State Government, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Officer Incharge, the Sponsoring Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Advisory Board, the Detaining Authority, the Advisory Board, the Central Government, the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board, the Advocate of the, Additional Advocate General, the Detaining Authority, State, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, SC, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No, the Detaining Authority, Court, the Detaining Authority, The Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, Court, 2.9.96, the Detaining Authority, 31.8.96, the District Magistrate, the Detaining Authority, Court

DATE: the same day, the same day, one year, 30.8.97.4, that day, future.10, 1958, 3239 of 1996

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, 2.9.96, the Constitution of India, 2.9.96, 2.9.96, the Constitution of India, 2.9.96, 2.9.96, 2.9.96, 2.9.96, 2.9.96, the Constitution of India

ORDINAL: second, third, first, first, second

GPE: India, illusory.12, Bombay, India, Ground

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //